newspaper
legal-news
KIM v. SAX LLP
25-cv-19021
D.N.J.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court terminated the civil case Wagner v. Sax LLP, which was previously consolidated with Kim v. Sax LLP. This means that the case is now closed and no further proceedings will take place. The termination of the case has significant implications for the parties involved.
Latest development
2:25-cv-18996 YOUNG, v. SAX LLP
Order · May 1, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filing
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-19031 WAGNER v. SAX LLP
Other · May 01, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
6 articles
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
7 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 6 related articles from 1 distinct source.
update What Changed This Week
1 event
gavel
Order
6 days ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel ( 19
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
6 events
info
Other
May 1, 2026
2:25-cv-19031 WAGNER v. SAX LLP
The court terminated the civil case Wagner v. Sax LLP, which was previously consolidated with Kim v. Sax LLP. This means that the case is now closed and no further proceedings will take place. The termination of the case has significant implications for the parties involved.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
2:25-cv-19015 GREEN v. SAX LLP
The court terminated the civil case of Green v. Sax LLP, effectively closing the case. This decision means that the case is no longer active and will not proceed to trial. The termination of the case is a consequence of the court's review of the case's status.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
2:25-cv-18997 LIU v. SAX LLP
The court terminated the civil case of LIU v. SAX LLP. This means the lawsuit is closed and no further action will be taken. The termination likely occurred because the parties reached a settlement or the court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction.
gavel
Order
May 1, 2026
2:25-cv-18996 YOUNG, v. SAX LLP
A Motion was filed.
info
Other
May 1, 2026
2:25-cv-19013 GUERCIO v. SAX LLP
The court terminated the civil case Guercio v. Sax LLP, which was previously consolidated with Kim v. Sax LLP. This means that the case is now closed and will no longer be heard by the court. The termination of the case resolves any outstanding issues and brings the matter to a final conclusion.
info
Other
April 30, 2026
2:25-cv-19021 KIM v. SAX LLP
The court terminated the civil case of Kim v. Sax LLP, effectively ending the lawsuit. This decision means that the case is closed and no further action will be taken. The termination of the case may be due to various reasons, such as a settlement or dismissal.
Advertisement
newspaper
6 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 6 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
21 hours, 3 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.