USA v. Barbary et al
Case Summary
The court terminated the civil case Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al with docket number 3:22-mc-80002. This action was taken in the case USA v. Barbary et al. The termination of the civil case is a procedural step in the ongoing case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:22-mc-80002 Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 3:22-mc-80002 Rodriguez and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events3:22-mc-80002 Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al
The court terminated the civil case Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al with docket number 3:22-mc-80002. This action was taken in the case USA v. Barbary et al. The termination of the civil case is a procedural step in the ongoing case.
0:12-cr-60011-1 USA v. Barbary et al
The court transferred the case of USA v. Barbary et al to a different location for supervised release. This means that the defendant will be released from custody under the supervision of the court. The transfer is likely due to the defendant's eligibility for supervised release.
Press Coverage
0:12-cr-60011-1 USA v. Barbary et al
Transfer Out/Supervised Release ( 891
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
20 hours, 10 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.