2:25-cv-01291 Ketcham v. May
Joint Status Report Order Form for District Judges ( 18
Ketcham v. May is a civil matter pending under docket 25-cv-01291. The available record consists only of a joint status report order form, which places the case at an early procedural stage. No substantive filings, claims, or party positions are available from the current record. The court and jurisdiction are unconfirmed.
Latest development
Order · April 20, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingA federal court issued an order in Ketcham v. May on April 20, 2026, but the public record on this case remains thin. The docket number is 25-cv-01291, and no judge has been assigned yet.
The filing date is not confirmed in available records.
The most recent docket activity is a Joint Status Report order — a standard procedural step district judges use to get parties on the same page about scheduling, discovery, and any pending disputes. It signals the case is alive and moving, but it does not resolve anything on the merits.
The core legal issues have not been disclosed in available filings. The parties are identified as Ketcham and May, but their roles — plaintiff, defendant, or otherwise — and the nature of the underlying dispute are not confirmed by the current record. Without a complaint summary or judicial order addressing substance, the case's theory cannot be stated with confidence.
What is clear: the court is pushing the parties to report jointly, which means a scheduling conference or case management order is likely coming soon. That will set deadlines for discovery and motions, and it may produce the first substantive judicial statement about what this case is actually about.
Joint Status Report Order Form for District Judges ( 18
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an order.
Joint Status Report Order Form for District Judges ( 18
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
59 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.