0:26-cv-60858 PINZON-CAMARGO v. Broward Transitional Center et al
Order on Report and Recommendations ( 13
Cupete Salazar is suing Broward Transitional Center and related defendants in a civil action filed under docket 26-cv-60918. The case has reached the report-and-recommendations stage, meaning a magistrate judge has issued findings and the district court is now reviewing whether to adopt them. The docket entry references Document 13, an order on the report and recommendations. The court's disposition of that order will determine the next phase of litigation. No court is identified in the case record.
Latest development
Order · April 20, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingA federal civil rights case is open against Broward Transitional Center and unnamed defendants, filed as docket 26-cv-60918. Plaintiff Cupete Salazar brought the suit, though the precise claims have not been detailed in available filings. The case is active, with no judge yet assigned.
The only docket activity on record comes from April 20, 2026, when the court issued two orders acting on a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendations. Courts issue that kind of order when a magistrate has reviewed a complaint — often at the screening stage for pro se or in forma pauperis filings — and the district judge then adopts, rejects, or modifies the magistrate's conclusions.
Broward Transitional Center is a federal immigration detention facility in Broward County, Florida, operated under contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Civil suits against that facility typically allege conditions-of-confinement violations, denial of medical care, or due process claims tied to detention.
Whether Salazar's claims fall into those categories is not confirmed by the current record.
The dual orders on the same date suggest the court may have addressed both the merits of the magistrate's recommendation and a procedural matter — such as service of process or leave to proceed without prepaying fees — in separate rulings. Until the orders' full text is available, the practical effect on Salazar's claims is unclear.
No judge of record appears on the docket yet. That gap is unusual for an active case with court orders already entered, and may reflect a clerical lag in the public record or a case still moving through initial assignment. Watch for a formal judicial assignment, which will set the tone for how aggressively the court manages the schedule.
Order on Report and Recommendations ( 13
Open original open_in_newOrder of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant ( 9
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an order.
The court issued an order.
Order on Report and Recommendations ( 13
Order of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant ( 9
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.