civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al

09-cv-07700 C.D. Cal.
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jesus Galindo sued Lee Baca and others in the Central District of California. The court addressed a financial matter related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee, impacting the plaintiff’s ability to proceed without prepayment.

Latest development

2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al

Filing · May 11, 2026

In the case Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al, the plaintiff filed a financial entry related to the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee. This indicates the plaintiff requested to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will now consider this request to determine if the plaintiff qualifies for fee waiver.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • IFP filing fee
  • Access to court
  • Civil litigation costs
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Initial filing stage

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al

Filing · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 12 hours, 38 minutes ago

Jesus Galindo filed a lawsuit against Lee Baca and other defendants in the Central District of California, docket number 09-cv-07700. The case remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge. The plaintiff recently submitted a financial entry concerning the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee.

This filing suggests Galindo is seeking to proceed without paying the standard court fees, likely due to financial hardship. The case’s underlying claims and causes of action have not been publicly detailed at this stage.

The involvement of Lee Baca, the former Los Angeles County Sheriff, points to possible issues related to law enforcement conduct or civil rights, but the docket does not specify the allegations. The court’s next steps will depend on the judge assigned and any forthcoming motions or pleadings.

The IFP filing fee entry is procedural but signals the plaintiff’s intent to move forward despite financial barriers. The case’s progression will hinge on initial court rulings, including the acceptance of the IFP status and any early dispositive motions.

Monitoring filings for a judge assignment and the plaintiff’s complaint will clarify the dispute’s scope and legal theories. For now, the docket reflects preliminary procedural activity without substantive developments on the merits.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
description
Filing May 11, 2026

2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al

In the case Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al, the plaintiff filed a financial entry related to the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee. This indicates the plaintiff requested to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will now consider this request to determine if the plaintiff qualifies for fee waiver.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

5 hours, 32 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.