Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al
Case Summary
Jesus Galindo sued Lee Baca and others in the Central District of California. The court addressed a financial matter related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee, impacting the plaintiff’s ability to proceed without prepayment.
Latest development
2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al
Filing · May 11, 2026
In the case Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al, the plaintiff filed a financial entry related to the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee. This indicates the plaintiff requested to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will now consider this request to determine if the plaintiff qualifies for fee waiver.
description View filingKey Issues
- • IFP filing fee
- • Access to court
- • Civil litigation costs
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al
Filing · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Jesus Galindo filed a lawsuit against Lee Baca and other defendants in the Central District of California, docket number 09-cv-07700. The case remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge. The plaintiff recently submitted a financial entry concerning the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee.
This filing suggests Galindo is seeking to proceed without paying the standard court fees, likely due to financial hardship. The case’s underlying claims and causes of action have not been publicly detailed at this stage.
The involvement of Lee Baca, the former Los Angeles County Sheriff, points to possible issues related to law enforcement conduct or civil rights, but the docket does not specify the allegations. The court’s next steps will depend on the judge assigned and any forthcoming motions or pleadings.
The IFP filing fee entry is procedural but signals the plaintiff’s intent to move forward despite financial barriers. The case’s progression will hinge on initial court rulings, including the acceptance of the IFP status and any early dispositive motions.
Monitoring filings for a judge assignment and the plaintiff’s complaint will clarify the dispute’s scope and legal theories. For now, the docket reflects preliminary procedural activity without substantive developments on the merits.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:09-cv-07700 Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al
In the case Jesus Galindo v. Lee Baca et al, the plaintiff filed a financial entry related to the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee. This indicates the plaintiff requested to proceed without paying the standard court fees due to financial hardship. The court will now consider this request to determine if the plaintiff qualifies for fee waiver.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 32 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.