Financial Entry for IFP Filing Fee Recorded in Wagner et al v. Penrod et al
Case Summary
A financial entry recording an in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee was made in Wagner et al v. Penrod et al, Central District of California docket 08-cv-00342. This reflects payment or waiver status related to court fees.
Latest development
5:08-cv-00342 Jesse Wagner et al v. Gary Penrod et al
Filing · May 11, 2026
The plaintiffs in Jesse Wagner et al v. Gary Penrod et al filed a financial entry regarding the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee. This means the court recorded the payment status or waiver of the filing fee for this case. It matters because it confirms whether the plaintiffs have met the court's financial requirements to proceed without paying standard fees.
description View filingKey Issues
- • IFP filing fee
- • Financial entry
- • Fee waiver
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:08-cv-00342 Jesse Wagner et al v. Gary Penrod et al
Filing · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Gary Penrod, 5:08-cv-00342 Jesse Wagner.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Jesse Wagner and other plaintiffs filed suit against Gary Penrod and additional defendants in the Central District of California under docket number 08-cv-00342. The case remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge.
The plaintiffs recently submitted a financial entry related to the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee, indicating their request to proceed without prepaying court fees due to financial hardship. This filing signals the plaintiffs' intent to move forward despite limited resources.
The court has not issued any rulings or set a schedule, leaving the procedural posture in its early stages. The absence of a judge assignment suggests the case is still in initial processing, with no substantive motions or discovery underway.
The key issues remain unclear from the docket, but the IFP filing fee status is a necessary administrative step before the case can progress. The parties have not publicly disclosed the nature of the dispute or claims involved.
The next developments will likely focus on the court's decision regarding the IFP request and the formal assignment of a judge to manage the case.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:08-cv-00342 Jesse Wagner et al v. Gary Penrod et al
The plaintiffs in Jesse Wagner et al v. Gary Penrod et al filed a financial entry regarding the in forma pauperis (IFP) filing fee. This means the court recorded the payment status or waiver of the filing fee for this case. It matters because it confirms whether the plaintiffs have met the court's financial requirements to proceed without paying standard fees.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
7 hours, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.