Hughes v. DeJoy

description

Case Summary

The U.S. Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Hughes v. DeJoy, case number 2:21-cv-00906. This action signals the conclusion of the appellate court's review and allows the lower court to proceed with the case according to the appellate decision. The mandate is a procedural step that enforces the appellate ruling.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

W.D. Wash.

Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:21-cv-00906 Hughes v. DeJoy

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 12, 2026

2:21-cv-00906 Hughes v. DeJoy

The U.S. Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Hughes v. DeJoy, case number 2:21-cv-00906. This action signals the conclusion of the appellate court's review and allows the lower court to proceed with the case according to the appellate decision. The mandate is a procedural step that enforces the appellate ruling.

description View filing open_in_new