civil-litigation federal-courts

Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

23-cv-07645 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., docket number 1:23-cv-07645. This action signals the formal conclusion of appellate review and allows the lower court to proceed with implementing the appellate court's decision. Attorneys should note this step as it often triggers deadlines or enforcement of the judgment.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:23-cv-07645 Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Greyhound Lines, Inc and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 12, 2026

1:23-cv-07645 Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., docket number 1:23-cv-07645. This action signals the formal conclusion of appellate review and allows the lower court to proceed with implementing the appellate court's decision. Attorneys should note this step as it often triggers deadlines or enforcement of the judgment.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 hours, 53 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.