Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Case Summary
The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., docket number 1:23-cv-07645. This action signals the formal conclusion of appellate review and allows the lower court to proceed with implementing the appellate court's decision. Attorneys should note this step as it often triggers deadlines or enforcement of the judgment.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-07645 Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Greyhound Lines, Inc and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:23-cv-07645 Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., docket number 1:23-cv-07645. This action signals the formal conclusion of appellate review and allows the lower court to proceed with implementing the appellate court's decision. Attorneys should note this step as it often triggers deadlines or enforcement of the judgment.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 hours, 53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.