civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts

Liverpool v. The City of New York et al

20-cv-04629 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court postponed the scheduled conference in the case Ross et al v. City of New York et al, docket number 1:25-cv-07596. This delay pauses procedural progress and may affect upcoming deadlines or motions. Parties should adjust their timelines accordingly.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-07596 Ross et al v. City of New York et al

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 3 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization

7 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of New York, 1:22-cv-04493 Disability Rights New York, 1:20-cv-04629 Liverpool and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other May 12, 2026

1:25-cv-07596 Ross et al v. City of New York et al

The court postponed the scheduled conference in the case Ross et al v. City of New York et al, docket number 1:25-cv-07596. This delay pauses procedural progress and may affect upcoming deadlines or motions. Parties should adjust their timelines accordingly.

info
Other May 12, 2026

1:25-cv-10152 Bailey v. The City of New York et al

The case titled Bailey v. The City of New York et al was filed under docket number 1:25-cv-10152. This event indicates a new lawsuit involving the City of New York, separate from Liverpool v. The City of New York et al. It matters because it may affect or relate to ongoing litigation involving the city.

info
Other May 12, 2026

1:24-cv-06522 Americas Choice Veterans Construction Inc. v. City of New York et al

The United States Court of Appeals issued a mandate in the case Americas Choice Veterans Construction Inc. v. City of New York, which is related to the Liverpool v. The City of New York litigation. This mandate signals the conclusion of appellate review and directs the lower court to proceed accordingly. It matters because it moves the case closer to resolution or the next procedural step.

info
Other May 12, 2026

1:22-cv-04493 Disability Rights New York et al v. City of New York et al

The court scheduled a mediation conference in the case Disability Rights New York et al v. City of New York et al, docket number 1:22-cv-04493. This sets a formal opportunity for the parties to negotiate a settlement before further litigation. Mediation can save time and costs by resolving disputes without a trial.

info
Other May 12, 2026

1:20-cv-04629 Liverpool v. The City of New York et al

The court issued a mailing receipt in the case Liverpool v. The City of New York et al, case number 1:20-cv-04629. This confirms that court documents or notices were sent to the involved parties. It matters because it marks a formal step in the case's procedural timeline, ensuring parties receive necessary information.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

2 hours, 9 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.