3:24-cv-07074 Brown et al v. Brian Arden Wines Operating Company et al
Pro Hac Vice ( 56
The court granted a motion to admit Brian Arden Wines Operating Company as a defendant in the case Brown et al v. Brian Arden Wines Operating Company et al. This allows the company to participate in the case. The motion was granted under the Pro Hac Vice rule, which allows out-of-state attorneys to appear in the case.
Latest development
Order · May 1, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:24-cv-07074 Brown et al v. Brian Arden Wines Operating Company et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jeff Macomber, Brian Arden Wines Operating Company, 2:24-cv-07074 Foster Johnson and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order ( 24
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court granted a motion to admit Brian Arden Wines Operating Company as a defendant in the case Brown et al v. Brian Arden Wines Operating Company et al. This allows the company to participate in the case. The motion was granted under the Pro Hac Vice rule, which allows out-of-state attorneys to appear in the case.
The court issued an order.
Pro Hac Vice ( 56
USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order ( 24
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
15 hours, 26 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.