newspaper
legal-news
ActBlue LLC et al v. Paxton
26-cv-11986
D. Mass.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to appear pro hac vice for a lawyer in the ActBlue LLC et al v. Paxton case. This allows the lawyer to participate in the case from outside the state where the case is being heard. The lawyer's appearance is temporary and limited to this specific case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-11986 ActBlue LLC et al v. Paxton
Other · May 01, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:26-cv-11986 ActBlue LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
May 1, 2026
1:26-cv-11986 ActBlue LLC et al v. Paxton
The court granted a motion to appear pro hac vice for a lawyer in the ActBlue LLC et al v. Paxton case. This allows the lawyer to participate in the case from outside the state where the case is being heard. The lawyer's appearance is temporary and limited to this specific case.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
16 hours, 25 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.