newspaper
1:25-cv-07682 Carela v. Marshalls et al
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 17
May 5, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Fontanez v. Marshall et al
17-cv-09925
S.D.N.Y.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted an extension of time for the parties in Carela v. Marshalls et al to complete discovery, allowing them more time to gather evidence. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to gather and review evidence, potentially impacting the outcome of the case. The extension is for 17 days.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-07682 Carela v. Marshalls et al
Other · May 05, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:17-cv-09925 Fontanez and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:25-cv-07682 Carela v. Marshalls et al
The court granted an extension of time for the parties in Carela v. Marshalls et al to complete discovery, allowing them more time to gather evidence. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to gather and review evidence, potentially impacting the outcome of the case. The extension is for 17 days.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:17-cv-09925 Fontanez v. Marshall et al
The court processed a payment of fees for the pro se plaintiff, Fontanez, in the case of Fontanez v. Marshall et al. This payment is likely related to the plaintiff's ongoing litigation. The payment's processing indicates that the court has acknowledged the plaintiff's financial obligations.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:17-cv-09925 Fontanez v. Marshall et al
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
May 5, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.