1:25-cv-14912 Thomas v. Amtrak et al
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 63
The court granted an extension of time for discovery in the case of Thomas v. Amtrak et al, allowing the parties more time to complete their discovery process. This extension is relevant to the case of WEST v. MASSARA as it may impact the overall timeline for discovery in the case. The extension was granted for 63 days.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-14912 Thomas v. Amtrak et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
The court granted an extension of time for discovery in the case of Thomas v. Amtrak et al, allowing the parties more time to complete their discovery process. This extension is relevant to the case of WEST v. MASSARA as it may impact the overall timeline for discovery in the case. The extension was granted for 63 days.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of WEST v. MASSARA, citing concerns for the privacy of parties involved. The sealed documents are related to a confidential settlement agreement. This decision allows the parties to maintain confidentiality.
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 63
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 10 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.