1:25-cv-00145 Foster v. Mohamed et al
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 13
The court granted an extension of time for discovery in the case of Build v. Mohamed et al, allowing the parties more time to complete the discovery process. This extension is relevant to the ongoing litigation in the case. The extension was granted due to the complexity of the case.
Latest development
Order · April 28, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingOrder on Motion for Oral Argument ( 71
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court granted an extension of time for discovery in the case of Build v. Mohamed et al, allowing the parties more time to complete the discovery process. This extension is relevant to the ongoing litigation in the case. The extension was granted due to the complexity of the case.
The court received a diversity disclosure statement in the case of Johnson v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al, which is a separate case from Radtke v. et al. This statement is a required filing in cases where the parties are from different states, as is the case here. The filing does not indicate any significant developments in the case.
A Motion was filed.
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 13
Diversity Disclosure Statement ( 2
Order on Motion for Oral Argument ( 71
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.