2:25-cv-09340 Robert Reyes v. Frank Bisignano
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 21
The government filed a notice in the unrelated case of USA v. Arteaga et al, which is a separate matter from Flores Palma v. Arteta et al. This notice is a procedural step that does not directly impact the Flores Palma case. The notice is likely a routine filing in the Arteaga case.
Latest development
Appeal · May 4, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-09340 Robert Reyes v. Frank Bisignano
Appeal · May 04, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Frank Bisignano, 1:25-cv-09340 Flores Palma, 2:25-cv-09340 Robert Reyes and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 21
Open original open_in_newAppeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Motion was filed.
The government filed a notice in the unrelated case of USA v. Arteaga et al, which is a separate matter from Flores Palma v. Arteta et al. This notice is a procedural step that does not directly impact the Flores Palma case. The notice is likely a routine filing in the Arteaga case.
The Flores Palma v. Arteta et al case has been appealed to the US Court of Appeals. The appeal record has been sent to the USCA for review. This means the case will be examined by a higher court to determine if any previous decisions were incorrect.
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 21
Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 2 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.