DOCKET ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer. The Court will extend the deadline by 30 days only. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/06/2025. (pdw)
Case Summary
DOCKET ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer. The Court will extend the deadline by 30 days only. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/06/2025. (pdw)
Latest development
DOCKET ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer. The Court will extend the deadline by 30 days only. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/06/2025. (pdw)
Order · May 12, 2026
A Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer was filed.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
DOCKET ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer. The Court
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Steve C. Jones
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Steve C. Jones.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court granted a limited extension for the defendant to respond to the complaint. Judge Steve C. Jones issued an order on January 6, 2025, allowing the defendant 30 additional days to file an answer.
The defendant had requested more time, but the judge denied the request beyond the 30-day extension. This ruling sets a firm deadline for the defendant's response, signaling the court's intent to keep the case moving forward without significant delay. The case remains active, but the docket does not specify the court or the original filing date.
The limited extension suggests the defendant may be facing challenges meeting the original deadline but has not convinced the court that a longer delay is warranted. The next key step will be the defendant's answer, which will clarify their position and potentially shape the scope of the dispute.
The court's partial denial of the extension request indicates a strict approach to scheduling, which could affect future motions or requests for relief. Parties should prepare for the defendant's response within the new timeframe and anticipate further procedural developments once the answer is filed.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
DOCKET ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer. The Court will extend the deadline by 30 days only. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/06/2025. (pdw)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventDOCKET ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer. The Court will extend the deadline by 30 days only. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/06/2025. (pdw)
A Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.