civil-litigation habeas court-watch

Judge Indira Talwani Grants Extension to File Habeas Corpus Response

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Responses due by 4/22/2026. (Talwani, Indira) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

Latest development

Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Responses due by 4/22/2026. (Talwani, Indira) (Entered:

Order · May 12, 2026

A Motion was filed.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Presiding Judge

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Indira Talwani

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Indira Talwani.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 13 hours, 34 minutes ago

Judge Indira Talwani granted a motion to extend the deadline for filing responses to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The order, entered on April 17, 2026, sets the new deadline for responses and replies at April 22, 2026.

This extension follows a motion filed by one of the parties seeking additional time to prepare their filings. The case remains active, but the docket number and court details have not been publicly disclosed. The petition challenges the legality of the petitioner’s detention, a common use of habeas corpus petitions under Section 2241.

The extension suggests that the court anticipates complex or contested issues requiring more time for briefing. The judge has not issued any substantive rulings on the merits of the petition at this stage. The case is still in the preliminary procedural phase, focusing on briefing schedules rather than evidentiary hearings or dispositive motions.

The next key step will be the submission of the responses and replies by the new deadline, which will frame the arguments for the court’s consideration. The court’s management of deadlines indicates a cautious approach to ensuring thorough review before moving forward.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 13 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source expand_more

Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Responses due by 4/22/2026. (Talwani, Indira) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 12, 2026

Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Responses due by 4/22/2026. (Talwani, Indira) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

7 hours, 16 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.