civil-litigation environmental-law administrative-law federal-courts court-watch

New civil case McKelry v. Velasco assigned in Northern District of California

26-cv-04106 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Clarence McKelry v. Jose Velasco, docket 26-cv-04106 in the Northern District of California, is newly assigned and currently in intake. No substantive filings have been made yet.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Case assignment
  • Intake stage
  • Northern District of California
  • Pre-filing status
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:26-cv-04106 Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jose Velasco, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2:26-cv-04106 Clarence McKelry and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 12 hours ago

Clarence McKelry v. Jose Velasco is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-04106.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-04106 Clarence McKelry and 3:26-cv-04106 Little Manila Rising on one side and Jose Velasco and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the other.

The case is currently organized around Environmental regulation, contamination, or cleanup liability, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Agency action and administrative review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The case of Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al was assigned to the court by intake.

This means the case has been officially accepted by the court and will be handled by a judge. The case number is 3:26-cv-04106. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Clarence McKelry permission to proceed with his lawsuit without paying the required filing fee.

This decision allows McKelry to continue with his case against Jose Velasco. The court's ruling is significant because it enables McKelry to.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

3:26-cv-04106 Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al

The case of Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al was assigned to the court by intake. This means the case has been officially accepted by the court and will be handled by a judge. The case number is 3:26-cv-04106.

info
Other April 30, 2026

2:26-cv-04106 Clarence McKelry v. Jose Velasco

The court granted Clarence McKelry permission to proceed with his lawsuit without paying the required filing fee. This decision allows McKelry to continue with his case against Jose Velasco. The court's ruling is significant because it enables McKelry to pursue his claims despite financial constraints.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 5 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.