3:26-cv-04106 Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
~Util - Case Assigned by Intake
Clarence McKelry v. Jose Velasco, docket 26-cv-04106 in the Northern District of California, is newly assigned and currently in intake. No substantive filings have been made yet.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-04106 Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jose Velasco, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2:26-cv-04106 Clarence McKelry and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Clarence McKelry v. Jose Velasco is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-04106.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-04106 Clarence McKelry and 3:26-cv-04106 Little Manila Rising on one side and Jose Velasco and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the other.
The case is currently organized around Environmental regulation, contamination, or cleanup liability, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Agency action and administrative review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The case of Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al was assigned to the court by intake.
This means the case has been officially accepted by the court and will be handled by a judge. The case number is 3:26-cv-04106. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted Clarence McKelry permission to proceed with his lawsuit without paying the required filing fee.
This decision allows McKelry to continue with his case against Jose Velasco. The court's ruling is significant because it enables McKelry to.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The case of Little Manila Rising et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al was assigned to the court by intake. This means the case has been officially accepted by the court and will be handled by a judge. The case number is 3:26-cv-04106.
The court granted Clarence McKelry permission to proceed with his lawsuit without paying the required filing fee. This decision allows McKelry to continue with his case against Jose Velasco. The court's ruling is significant because it enables McKelry to pursue his claims despite financial constraints.
~Util - Case Assigned by Intake
Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 2
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 5 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.