newspaper
3:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al
Case Assigned/Reassigned
May 5, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Perra v. Reetz
26-cv-05006
D.N.J.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The case Perra v. Reetz was reassigned. This means a new judge has been assigned to the case. The reassignment occurred in the case 3:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al
Other · May 05, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
4 articles
3 sources tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 3 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
8 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Godrej SON Holdings, Inc, 3:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA, 2:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
4 events
info
Other
May 5, 2026
3:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al
The case Perra v. Reetz was reassigned. This means a new judge has been assigned to the case. The reassignment occurred in the case 3:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
2:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al
A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed in the case of Perra v. Reetz, seeking to challenge the detention of Miranda Cardoza. The petition was filed in the case 2:26-cv-05006, which is a separate case involving Mullin et al. This development may impact the proceedings in both cases.
info
Other
April 30, 2026
1:26-cv-05006 Alexander v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
The court has denied a motion to consolidate cases, effectively keeping the Alexander v. Godrej case separate from Perra v. Reetz. This decision means that the two cases will proceed independently, with their own schedules and outcomes. The consolidation motion was likely an attempt to streamline the litigation process and reduce costs.
info
Other
April 30, 2026
3:26-cv-05006 Perra v. Reetz
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of Perra v. Reetz, citing concerns for the privacy of individuals involved. The sealed documents are related to a confidential settlement agreement. This decision allows the parties to maintain confidentiality.
Advertisement
show_chart
Coverage Timeline
newspaper
4 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
2:26-cv-05006 MIRANDA CARDOZA v. MULLIN et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
May 5, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
newspaper
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.