civil-litigation settlement federal-courts court-watch

Ibanez Daza settles civil case against Albarran in Northern District of California

25-cv-10214 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The parties in Ibanez Daza v. Albarran have reached a settlement. The court filing indicates the case concluded with a settlement agreement after 17 days of proceedings. This resolution brings the litigation to a close. Further details of the settlement terms were not disclosed in the public record.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Settlement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-10214 David Scott Greathouse v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al

Other · May 08, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Ibanez Daza, David Scott Greathouse and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 14 hours ago

Ibanez Daza v. Albarran et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-10214.

The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-10214 David Scott Greathouse and 3:25-cv-10214 Ibanez Daza on one side and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Settlement posture and dismissal risk, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties reported a settlement. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, Ffriend v. Albarran et al, was assigned to the court by intake.

This means the court has taken on the responsibility of managing the case. The case number is 3:26-cv-03942. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of Ibanez Daza v. Albarran et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 7, 2026

2:25-cv-10214 David Scott Greathouse v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al

The parties reported a settlement.

info
Other May 1, 2026

3:26-cv-03942 Ffriend v. Albarran et al

A new case, Ffriend v. Albarran et al, was assigned to the court by intake. This means the court has taken on the responsibility of managing the case. The case number is 3:26-cv-03942.

info
Other May 1, 2026

3:25-cv-10214 Ibanez Daza v. Albarran et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of Ibanez Daza v. Albarran et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 14 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.