District of Colorado
This case centers on Michael Wright's legal action against Araiza, outlining claims and seeking appropriate judicial resolution.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
44662 cases tracked · 44636 currently active
Showing 20 of 44662 matching cases
District of Colorado
This case centers on Michael Wright's legal action against Araiza, outlining claims and seeking appropriate judicial resolution.
District of New Jersey
This civil case concerns a dispute between P Logistics X Corp. and Prime Log LLC regarding contractual obligations and delivery performance. The parties are seeking to resolve the dispute through litigation, with the case potentially impacting supply chain logistics and contractual law.
District of New Jersey
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A is a case involving multiple defendants identified as partnerships. The absence of a current summary limits insight into the claims or issues, but the naming convention suggests potential intellectual property, contract, or business disputes involving
District of New Jersey
In Stubbs v. CHR Employees, LLC, the case was terminated by court order, effectively ending the litigation. Termination may result from settlement, dismissal, or other procedural grounds. This marks the conclusion of the dispute before further substantive rulings.
Central District of California
Harshaw has filed a civil lawsuit against Officer Cummings and others. No docket summary or procedural information is provided, leaving the case claims and status unknown.
District of Colorado
Taylor v. Zillow Inc et al is a civil case with active motion practice, as indicated by a reply to a response to a motion. The case likely involves disputes over claims against Zillow and possibly other defendants, though specifics are not provided.
Central District of California
USA v. Pierre is a criminal case in which hearings have been terminated as indicated by the docket entry. This may reflect a resolution such as a plea agreement, dismissal, or other procedural conclusion. Details on the substantive charges or outcomes are not provided, but the termination of hearings suggests a
District of Columbia
Dupray Ventures Inc. et al filed a motion to stay proceedings against Geluobeier (Shenzhen) Information Technology Co. Ltd. et al, which the court has addressed. A stay would pause litigation activities, potentially to allow settlement discussions or resolution of related matters. The court's decision on the motion
District of Columbia
In the case of Whitfield v. Levi Strauss & Co., the court issued an order on a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant. The motion to dismiss challenges the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's claims, seeking to have the case dismissed before proceeding to trial. The order addresses whether the plaintiff's complaint
Central District of California
A notice of counsel appearance or withdrawal was filed in Avalos v. General Motors in the Central District of California. This updates the court on changes in legal representation.
Northern District of California
An electronic filing error was noted in Malmstein v. 6Sense Insights, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The error may affect the timeliness or acceptance of court documents.
Southern District of Florida
A new attorney appearance was filed in Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia in the Southern District of Florida. This updates the court on counsel representation.
Southern District of Florida
An attorney withdrew from representation in United States v. All Heart Pharmacy in the Southern District of Florida. This may affect case strategy and timing.
Southern District of Florida
The clerk issued an electronic case and summons notice in Laneau v. Steiner in the Southern District of Florida. This formalizes the initiation of the case and notifies parties of the summons.
Southern District of Florida
The Southern District of Florida granted an extension of time in Milian v. State of Florida. The extension allows additional time for a party to meet a deadline.
Southern District of New York
Deadlines and hearings were set in the Gromina v. Forexonia, LLC civil case in the Southern District of New York. The court established a schedule to move the case forward.
Southern District of New York
The Southern District of New York issued a default judgment in Griffin v. Corporation Counsel. The judgment likely follows the defendant's failure to respond or appear in the case.
Southern District of New York
Returned mail was noted in the Carrion v. Kopp civil case in the Southern District of New York. This indicates potential issues with service of process or communication with parties involved.
Southern District of New York
Stary submitted a proposed case management plan against Teladoc Health in the Southern District of New York. The plan outlines the schedule and procedures for managing the litigation going forward.
Southern District of Florida
USA v. Sealed Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device is a criminal case with a current docket number of 26-mj-02423. The court has issued a magistrate judge miscellaneous matter order, and the case is ongoing. The defendant, Sealed Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device, is a sealed matter, and the case involves