Central District of California
The parties in Klauber Brothers v. Jonathon Simkhai filed a joint Rule 26(f) discovery plan in the Central District of California. The plan sets the schedule and scope for discovery activities.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
44738 cases tracked · 44738 currently active
Showing 20 of 44738 matching cases
Central District of California
The parties in Klauber Brothers v. Jonathon Simkhai filed a joint Rule 26(f) discovery plan in the Central District of California. The plan sets the schedule and scope for discovery activities.
Southern District of Florida
Montoya filed a notice of address change in the Southern District of Florida civil case 25-cv-21832. This updates the court and parties on the new contact information for Montoya or counsel.
District of New Jersey
Mail sent in Cango v. Bergen County Jail Administrator was returned undelivered in the District of New Jersey. This may indicate issues with serving documents or contacting parties.
District of New Jersey
A notice of appearance was filed in Berk v. Jameson in the District of New Jersey. This indicates that counsel has formally entered the case on behalf of a party.
Eastern District of Texas
The summons was returned executed in Exim Incorporated v. Republic Equipment, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas. This confirms that the defendant was formally served with the complaint.
District of Massachusetts
The District of Massachusetts assigned the case Perre v. Popeyes to a judge. This administrative step advances the case toward active litigation and scheduling.
Northern District of California
The parties in Noj Ramirez v. Blue Star Claims LLC submitted a joint case management statement in the Northern District of California. This filing outlines the parties' plans for discovery, motions, and trial preparation.
District of Delaware
A stipulation was filed in Miller v. Davenport et al in the District of Delaware. The parties agreed on certain terms, which may streamline the litigation or resolve specific procedural or substantive issues.
Northern District of Illinois
The attorney representing the plaintiff in Adams v. Arcadia Care, Inc. withdrew from the case in the Northern District of Illinois. This change may affect the plaintiff's ability to proceed without legal counsel or require new representation.
Southern District of New York
Stringer v. Penguin Random House LLC is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 25-cv-09953. The case involves an order for an initial pretrial conference, which is a document that outlines the next steps in the litigation process. The initial pretrial conference is a key step in the
Southern District of New York
Reconsideration was filed in Zhu v. Wang et al, a case with docket number 23-cv-01395. The filing date is unknown. The case type is unknown.
Southern District of New York
Noe et al v. Smart Mortgage Centers, Inc. et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 21-cv-01668. The current summary of the case is an appearance pro hac vice, which is 376 pages long.
Central District of California
In the lawsuit filed by Teacher against Credence Resource Management, LLC and others, the court issued a text order outlining the necessary actions and rulings. The order provides a concise summary of the court's decisions, indicating that the matter is progressing through the legal process without additional details
Southern District of New York
Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust v. Delta Ironworks, Inc. involves a default judgment in favor of the pension trust, holding Delta Ironworks liable for pension fund mismanagement. The judgment awards significant monetary damages.
Central District of California
McDade v. The Beachwaver, Co. (1:26-cv-02028) received an Extension of Time to File Answer.
Southern District of New York
The parties have agreed to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge in Case 3:26-cv-02597, JLT Imports, Inc. v. Imiracle (HK) Limited, as indicated by the consent to proceed form filed.
Southern District of New York
The notice setting or resetting hearing on motion in Doe v. Lawrence General Hospital pertains to a legal proceeding where the timing of a hearing related to a motion has been adjusted. This action is often taken to accommodate scheduling conflicts or to ensure that all parties are adequately prepared for the hearing.
Southern District of New York
Shark Properties LLC is engaged in litigation against American Family Insurance Company. An order has been issued on a motion to withdraw as attorney, indicating changes in legal representation. The case remains active, with procedural developments affecting counsel involvement.
Southern District of New York
In Gomez v. Gruma Corporation, the court docket includes an opposition or response to a motion. This filing represents the defendant or plaintiff contesting a request made to the court, which may concern procedural or substantive matters. Specifics of the motion or response content are not provided.
Southern District of New York
Jessica Badenoch brought a civil case against Riedell Shoes, Inc. and others. A recent procedural event involved the reassignment of the case due to a self-recusal by a judge, which may affect the timeline and judicial oversight of the matter.