Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

In the case titled Olaguez v. Rosco Production LA LLC, the plaintiff Olaguez has filed a civil lawsuit against Rosco Production LA LLC in federal court, docket number 26-cv-03314. The case involves a notice categorized as 'Other,' though specific details regarding the nature of the dispute or claims have not been

Southern District of New York

Palmetto Advisors II LLC filed a notice of deleted document in its case against Equiniti Trust in the Southern District of New York. The notice informs the court and parties of document removal from the record.

Western District of Washington

The Wolfclan case against Pierce County advanced with a report and recommendation from the magistrate judge in the Western District of Washington. The report advises the district judge on case disposition.

District of New Jersey

Dalnoky served a certificate of service in a civil case against Catona in the District of New Jersey. This certificate confirms proper delivery of legal documents to opposing parties.

District of Massachusetts

Cruz filed excess pages in a civil case in the District of Massachusetts. The filing indicates submission of documents exceeding standard page limits, requiring court approval.

District of Massachusetts

Radius Recycling disclosed information under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 in its suit against Hydra Tech, Inc. This disclosure is part of the mandatory exchange of evidence before trial.

Central District of California

Eade filed a status report in a long-running suit against Investorshub.com, Inc. The report updates the court on case progress and any outstanding issues.

Central District of California

The Nersesyan case in the Central District of California settled after mediation. The parties reached a complete resolution, ending the dispute without further court intervention.

Central District of California

Jacksonbey faces default judgment proceedings in the Central District of California. The court issued a deficiency notice related to default judgment, signaling potential adverse consequences for failure to respond.

Central District of California

GS Holistic, LLC scheduled proceedings against Cosmo Smoke Shop LLC in the Central District of California. The scheduling notice sets key dates for case management and deadlines.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York granted leave to file the case under seal in ABC v. DEF, allowing sensitive information to remain confidential. This step typically protects trade secrets or private data during litigation.

Southern District of Florida

Itow.Boats, LLC v. M/V Mozz et al is a civil case with a current docket number of 23-cv-24176. The court has issued an order on a motion for settlement, indicating that the case is ongoing but the outcome is uncertain. The case involves a dispute between two parties over a maritime agreement, and the court has issued

District of Colorado

Wright v. Starbucks Corporation is a civil case with a current summary of an acknowledgment of receipt. The court has not been specified. The docket number is 25-cv-26156. This case is currently in the early stages of litigation, with no further information available at this time.

District of New Jersey

A stipulation and proposed order were filed in the federal criminal case against Mata, outlining mutual agreements and next steps in the litigation process.

Southern District of New York

Daniel Garcia initiated a lawsuit against M.E. Dey & Co., INC. and others, seeking to set and reset deadlines and hearings. The case involves multiple parties and procedural matters.

District of Columbia

The report and recommendations detail the proceedings under docket number 25-cv-03798.

District of Colorado

This case centers on Michael Wright's legal action against Araiza, outlining claims and seeking appropriate judicial resolution.

District of New Jersey

This civil case concerns a dispute between P Logistics X Corp. and Prime Log LLC regarding contractual obligations and delivery performance. The parties are seeking to resolve the dispute through litigation, with the case potentially impacting supply chain logistics and contractual law.

District of New Jersey

XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A is a case involving multiple defendants identified as partnerships. The absence of a current summary limits insight into the claims or issues, but the naming convention suggests potential intellectual property, contract, or business disputes involving

District of New Jersey

In Stubbs v. CHR Employees, LLC, the case was terminated by court order, effectively ending the litigation. Termination may result from settlement, dismissal, or other procedural grounds. This marks the conclusion of the dispute before further substantive rulings.