Browse Cases

District of New Jersey

Lisano filed a civil lawsuit against Walters and other defendants in the District of New Jersey, docket number 25-cv-01858. The case recently involved a Markman response brief, indicating ongoing claim construction disputes related to patent or contract interpretation.

Central District of California

USA v. Bland et al is a criminal case with docket number 24-cr-00344. A manual filing was made, but the nature of the filing is not specified. Further information is needed to determine the significance of this filing. The case is still pending, and further action may be taken.

Central District of California

The plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file a response in a multi-district litigation involving Opportunity Financial, LLC and related entities. The motion argues that the original deadline was unreasonably tight.

Southern District of New York

Order on Motion to Amend/Correct ( 54) refers to a legal proceeding where a motion was filed to amend or correct certain aspects of the case. The order signifies the court's decision on the motion, determining whether the requested amendments or corrections will be granted.

Southern District of New York

This case involves Olaughlin's litigation against ReliaStar Life Insurance Company and others. The docket entry reflects a clerk's notice regarding consent or declination, which typically pertains to whether parties agree to proceed before a magistrate judge. No substantive details about the underlying dispute are

Southern District of New York

In this civil litigation, plaintiffs O'Shaughnessy et al have filed a notice of withdrawal of counsel in their case against Albertson's LLC, docket number 25-cv-06170. This procedural update may impact case management and timelines as new counsel may be retained or the parties proceed pro se.

District of Colorado

In Ulloa II v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., an opposition to a motion was filed, indicating contested procedural or substantive issues. Oppositions reflect a party's disagreement with a motion filed by the opposing side and can influence the court's rulings on motions such as summary judgment or procedural

Northern District of California

Starr v. OpenAI Group PBC involves a standing order related to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs, indicating procedural guidance or requirements for self-represented litigants in this matter. The case docket does not provide substantive details on claims or defenses but highlights court management of pro se filings.

Central District of California

Antonacci v. Descrybe, LLC features a reply brief filed by one party, indicating active briefing on a contested issue. The nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the procedural posture suggests ongoing motion practice or summary judgment briefing.

Southern District of New York

Sharon v. IIMPACT et al involves a civil dispute with multiple defendants. The docket notes miscellaneous relief sought or granted, indicating various procedural or substantive motions may be pending. Specific details about the claims or relief requested are not provided.

Southern District of New York

N.L.A. v. Frank Bisignano, docket number 25-cv-02773, is a civil case with no summary details currently available. The case likely involves a dispute between the named plaintiff and defendant, but specifics regarding claims or legal issues have not been disclosed.

Southern District of New York

Rippey has filed a civil action against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, docket number 25-cv-00926. The case currently involves an order on a motion for attorney fees, suggesting that the court is considering awarding legal costs to one party, likely following a decision on the merits or

Northern District of California

Parker v. United States of America involves a case initially filed under docket 26-cv-02922. The case has been transferred out of the original court to a U.S. Court of Appeals, indicating an appellate review or jurisdictional change. No further substantive details are available regarding the claims or issues involved.

Southern District of New York

This civil case involves the Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Funds and the Trustees thereof, along with the Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters as successors to the Keystone Mountain Lakes Regional Council of Carpenters, against Showboat Hotel. The matter appears to be in a procedural phase

Northern District of California

First Solar, Inc. has initiated litigation against Canadian Solar Inc. and others. The case details are largely redacted, limiting insight into the specific claims or defenses involved. The redactions suggest sensitive commercial or proprietary information may be at issue.

Central District of California

The case 4:25-cv-01207 Thomas v. Sillivent et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Thomas, and the defendants, Sillivent and others. The docket entry referenced is a Notice (Other), indicating a procedural or administrative filing rather than a substantive motion or ruling. Without additional details on

Western District of Washington

Mail was returned in the Rusk v. Trump case pending in the Western District of Washington. Returned mail can indicate service issues or address problems, potentially delaying proceedings.

Central District of California

The Central District of California remanded Shahrooz Bigonah's case against Target N. Hollywood to state court. Remand typically occurs when federal jurisdiction is improper or waived.

Central District of California

Terrace Alvardo LLC notified counsel about the option to consent to proceed before a magistrate judge in the Central District of California. Magistrate consent can streamline case management and trial scheduling.

Central District of California

The Sierra Club and MarBorg Industries reached a settlement in their environmental suit in the Central District of California. The settlement ends the dispute without trial, likely involving agreed remediation or compliance terms.