Browse Cases

Central District of California

This criminal case involves the United States government prosecuting Bui and others under docket 24-cr-00100. The most recent filing is a STAR Program Status Report, indicating ongoing monitoring or compliance related to the case. Specific charges or allegations are not detailed in the available summary.

Central District of California

USA v. Woodard et al is a criminal case currently at the sentencing phase. The defendants face charges brought by the government, and the court is determining appropriate penalties based on the offenses and relevant sentencing guidelines.

Central District of California

NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. THE BOROUGH OF SPRING LAKE et al is an ongoing case with no publicly available summary or docket entries. The lack of information limits understanding of the dispute's nature, parties' claims, or procedural posture at this time.

Central District of California

Nervora Fashion, Inc. has filed a civil lawsuit against Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. under docket 1:24-cv-04805. No substantive filings or summaries are currently available, leaving the nature of the dispute and claims unclear. The case is in its early stages, with no recorded motions or court orders. Further

Northern District of California

TD Bank, N.A. v. City of Passaic et al involves a proposed order, indicating ongoing judicial consideration of motions or case management issues. The case likely concerns a dispute between a financial institution and a municipal entity, possibly involving contractual or financial matters. Details on the substantive

Southern District of New York

ACHEAMPONG has filed a case against JBG SMITH PROPERTIES LP under docket 26-cv-00225. The current update relates to an order granting an extension of time to file a response or reply, indicating procedural developments but no details on the underlying dispute.

Southern District of New York

In the case 2:26-cv-00272 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al, Peninsula Technologies filed a complaint against Verizon Wireless and related parties. The docket reflects an unopposed application by the defendants for an extension of time to answer the complaint. This

Central District of California

Kenjuan De Adams filed an in forma pauperis application in the Central District of California, docket number 19-cv-00476. The filing seeks to waive court fees due to inability to pay, permitting the case to proceed under reduced financial burden.

Central District of California

Lawrence Gene Kirkley filed an in forma pauperis application in the Central District of California under docket 21-cv-02120. The application requests waiver of filing fees due to financial hardship, allowing the case to proceed without upfront costs.

Central District of California

Creative Writer Software filed a memorandum of contentions of fact and law in the Central District of California civil case against Schechter. The docket number is 23-cv-02471. This filing outlines the party’s factual and legal positions, advancing the case toward resolution.

Central District of California

The Central District of California recorded a financial entry in the civil case Jerry Kelly v. People of California. The docket number is 25-cv-12409. The entry likely relates to fees or costs associated with the litigation but does not indicate substantive rulings.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois granted McCrory leave to file a document in the civil case against Homewood Illinois. The docket number is 25-cv-04428. This procedural order allows the plaintiff to submit additional filings, potentially advancing their claims or defenses.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida issued a summons in the civil case Castro v. Whole Foods Market Group. The docket number is 26-cv-23090. The summons initiates formal service of process on the defendant, marking the start of active litigation.

District of Columbia

In the District of Columbia, Labrador v. NTV International Corporation remains active with a recent status report filed. The docket number is 24-cv-03541. The report informs the court of developments but does not indicate any dispositive rulings or case closure.

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts court stayed the civil case Lin v. Zhong pending further proceedings. The docket number is 21-cv-10510. The stay pauses all case activity, likely to await resolution of related matters or to allow parties to explore settlement or other procedural steps.

District of Massachusetts

Innovative Sports Management voluntarily dismissed its civil case against Larner, III in the District of Massachusetts. The dismissal was filed under docket 26-cv-11550. The voluntary dismissal ends the litigation without a court ruling on the merits, likely reflecting a settlement or strategic decision by the

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts court received a status report in the civil case United States ex rel. Witkin v. Medtronic. The docket number is 11-cv-10790. The report updates the court on the current posture of the litigation but does not indicate any resolution or dispositive rulings at this time. The case remains

Southern District of Florida

A judge has ordered the unsealing of a document in the search warrant case, which is currently pending in an unknown court. The case was filed with a docket number of 25-mj-04428. The details of the document are not available at this time. The case is a matter related to a search warrant.

Northern District of California

USA v. Application for a Search Warrant for One Account for Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a) and Other Offenses is a case where an order on motion to seal was issued. The case was filed in the magistrate court with docket number 26-mj-70549. The court's decision to seal the case suggests that sensitive information

Central District of California

This case is a scheduling notice in a federal lawsuit involving Minehart Medical Corporation and Sentinel Insurance Company. The notice outlines the procedural steps and timelines for the litigation, but specific details about the case's nature and the parties involved are not provided.