District of Colorado
In Karmeris v. Fischer et al, the attorney representing one party has formally withdrawn in the District of Colorado. This withdrawal may impact the party's ability to proceed effectively without new counsel.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
44130 cases tracked · 44130 currently active
Showing 20 of 44130 matching cases
District of Colorado
In Karmeris v. Fischer et al, the attorney representing one party has formally withdrawn in the District of Colorado. This withdrawal may impact the party's ability to proceed effectively without new counsel.
District of Columbia
The civil case Torres et al v. Nana's Colombian Bakery in the District of Columbia has stalled due to the mediation conference not being held as scheduled. This delay may affect the timeline for resolution and could lead to further procedural setbacks.
Southern District of New York
Remppel v. Long Island RailRoad Company is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was referred to a magistrate judge on September 9. The docket number is 25-cv-07156. The case involves a civil dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant, but the details of the case are not clear.
Southern District of New York
Scott v. Tenmile Farm Foundation et al is a civil case with a current status of Proposed Stipulation and Order (18). The case is currently pending in an unknown court with docket number 25-cv-07388. The parties have proposed a stipulation and order, which is currently pending approval. The case involves a dispute
Northern District of Illinois
Johnson v. Clark et al is a case where the court has issued an order on motion for attorney representation. The court's decision on this motion is a key development in the case, but the current status of the case is unknown. The court's order may impact the case's trajectory and the parties' arguments.
Southern District of New York
USA v. Lapolla is a stipulation and proposed order filed in the court. The stipulation outlines an agreement between the parties.
Northern District of Illinois
The court dismissed the lawsuit filed by Patrick McKillen et al against Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa bin Khalifa bin Abdullah bin Jassim bin Mohammaed Al Thani et al. The dismissal is based on legal grounds or other reasons specified in the court's order.
Southern District of New York
Pierce files a certificate with the court, providing disclosures required under Rule 7.1 for interested entities in the corporate case.
Southern District of New York
This case involves a motion to extend the time for filing a response in a civil lawsuit. The summary indicates that the extension request has been granted, allowing the parties more time to prepare their defense.
Southern District of New York
This civil lawsuit, docketed under 3:24-cv-09417, involves Watts against Gateway Public Schools. The current summary indicates a stipulation and proposed order, suggesting that the parties have reached an agreement on certain aspects of the litigation, and the court is evaluating the proposed order.
Southern District of New York
Jackeline Yessica Torres Sotomayor has filed a case against Pamela Bondi and others. No docket activity or summary information is currently available, indicating an early or inactive stage of litigation.
Southern District of New York
Mims has filed a civil lawsuit against the Cook County Sheriff Department under docket number 26-cv-03265. The case details and claims are not specified, but it involves a dispute likely related to governmental or law enforcement conduct.
Southern District of New York
Woodrum v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) et al features an extension of time granted by the court. This procedural order provides additional time for parties to meet deadlines, reflecting active case management.
Central District of California
This case, Herzog v. Schroeter et al., was transferred out of its original district court. The transfer indicates a procedural change in venue, which may affect the timeline and jurisdictional considerations of the litigation. Specific details about the claims or parties involved are not provided.
Central District of California
Winkler et al v. US Enforcement Agency, LLC et al concerns a motion for default judgment. The court issued an order on this motion, suggesting that one party may have failed to respond or appear, leading to potential judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. This procedural development is significant in advancing the case
Southern District of New York
Hani Senou et al v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company et al is a civil case involving a complaint and discovery activities. The dispute likely concerns insurance-related issues given the defendant's identity. Ongoing discovery suggests active fact-finding and evidence exchange, which will be critical in
Southern District of New York
In the case 3:25-cv-10137 G.G., by and through Omar Guerra et al v. Roblox Corporation, the plaintiffs, represented by Omar Guerra on behalf of G.G., have initiated litigation against Roblox Corporation. The docket entry referenced pertains to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) certification, indicating that the
Southern District of Florida
The court granted an extension of time in Cannet v. The Mad Room Hospitality LLC in the Southern District of Florida. The extension allows additional time for procedural steps.
Southern District of Florida
Felder v. Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County settled in the Southern District of Florida. The settlement ends the dispute without trial or further litigation.
Northern District of California
The summons was returned executed in Great American Insurance v. United Parcel Service in the Northern District of California. This confirms the defendant was formally served with the complaint.