2:26-cv-00272 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al
Case Summary
In the case 2:26-cv-00272 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al, Peninsula Technologies filed a complaint against Verizon Wireless and related parties. The docket reflects an unopposed application by the defendants for an extension of time to answer the complaint. This procedural motion indicates that the defendants are seeking additional time to prepare their formal response to the allegations made by Peninsula Technologies. No substantive rulings or details about the underlying claims are provided in the available information.
Key Issues
- • Extension of time to respond to complaint
- • Procedural compliance with court deadlines
- • Initial stages of civil litigation
- • Plaintiff-defendant procedural interactions
- • Case management and scheduling
Case Timeline
2 events2:26-cv-00283 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
[Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint] (<a href="https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/doc1/175115323303?caseid=244891&de_seq_num=22">7</a>)
2:26-cv-00272 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al
[Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint] (<a href="https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/doc1/175115323280?caseid=244838&de_seq_num=32">11</a>)
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-00283 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
[Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint] (<a href="https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/doc1/175115323303?caseid=244891&de_seq_num=22">7</a>)
2:26-cv-00272 Peninsula Technologies, LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al
[Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint] (<a href="https://ecf.txed.uscourts.gov/doc1/175115323280?caseid=244838&de_seq_num=32">11</a>)