Browse Cases

Central District of California

USA v. Tapia is a criminal case in the Central District of California. An attorney appearance or reassignment for the Federal Public Defenders Office has been filed. This indicates representation for the defendant by the public defender's office.

Northern District of Illinois

Sample v. Cook County, Illinois et al is a civil action in the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This request permits litigants to bypass standard court filing fees due to financial hardship.

Northern District of Illinois

Jones v. John Doe's 1-5 is a civil case in the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This allows individuals who cannot afford court fees to proceed with their lawsuit without paying them.

Central District of California

USA v. Li is a criminal case filed in the Central District of California. No specific filing details are available beyond the case title and court. The nature of the charges or proceedings is not indicated.

Northern District of Illinois

USA v. Neville, Jr. is a criminal case. The case is currently pending in the Northern District of Illinois with docket number 17-cr-50032. The current status of the case is a sealed order.

Northern District of Illinois

Murray et al v. Cresco Labs Inc. et al is a civil case. The case is currently pending in the Northern District of Illinois with docket number 26-cv-50184. The current status of the case is unknown.

Northern District of Illinois

Everest Indemnity Insurance Company v. Kates Detective & Security Agency and Special Events Services, Inc. et al is a civil dispute in the Northern District of Illinois. A default judgment has been entered. This means one party failed to respond or appear, leading to a judgment against them.

Northern District of Illinois

VENTO v. WALMART, INC. et al is a civil case in the Northern District of Illinois. A filing related to setting or clearing flags has been made. This likely pertains to internal court docket management or case status indicators.

Northern District of Illinois

Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC is a civil matter before the Northern District of Illinois. A declaration has been filed in the case. This document typically contains sworn statements of fact relevant to a legal dispute.

Central District of California

USA v. MARTINEZ-ESPINAL is a criminal case in the Central District of California. A sealed document has been filed in the docket. The nature of the document and its contents are not publicly available.

Central District of California

This civil case, (K.R.D.), an Individual v. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC et al, is proceeding in the Central District of California. A notice regarding resources for pro se litigants has been filed. This indicates at least one party is representing themselves without legal counsel.

Central District of California

Johnson-Rocha v. Immunovant, Inc. is a civil suit filed in the Central District of California. The court granted an extension for the defendant to file a response or reply. The case remains active.

USA v. Harris et al is a criminal case with docket number 16-cr-00164. The government filed a 255-page document titled 'Terminate Hearings,' indicating significant procedural developments in the criminal prosecution.

Dunlap v. Nobs Towing is a civil case under docket number 26-cv-05079. A 5-page filing concerning attorney representation has been submitted, but no substantive case details are available.

Little v. Walmart Inc. is a civil case filed under docket number 24-cv-04562. The case includes a 75-page summary judgment filing, indicating a dispositive motion is pending or decided.

Bidegain et al v. Plazas Vega is a civil case under docket number 22-cv-60338. The parties filed a detailed 269-page status report, indicating ongoing complex litigation requiring court oversight.

Argueta-Lopez v. Miami ICE Field Office Director et al is a civil case filed under docket number 26-cv-22010. No substantive summary is available, leaving the nature of the claims and procedural posture unknown.

District of Massachusetts

Sterner v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts is a civil case filed in the District of Massachusetts. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 26-cv-40124. The current summary indicates that a PSSA order has been issued, allowing the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis without an account

District of Massachusetts

Rhodes v. Marlette et al is a civil case filed in the District of Massachusetts. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 26-cv-12017. The current summary indicates that a filing fee has been received.

District of Massachusetts

Peralta Duran v. Coolidge Fitness LLC is a civil case filed in the District of Massachusetts. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-11407. The current summary indicates that an abbreviated electronic appeal record has been sent to the USCA.