2:26-cv-04611 George Alexander Lugo v. Stovall et al
Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants (CV-134) - optional html form ( 7
This civil case, (K.R.D.), an Individual v. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC et al, is proceeding in the Central District of California. A notice regarding resources for pro se litigants has been filed. This indicates at least one party is representing themselves without legal counsel.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04611 George Alexander Lugo v. Stovall et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
7 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 1:26-cv-04611 (K.R.D.), an Individual and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
(K.R.D.), an Individual v. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-04611.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-04611 (K.R.D.), an Individual and 2:26-cv-04611 George Alexander Lugo on one side and Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON on the other. The case is currently organized around unknown court.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants was filed. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has denied a motion in the case of Maier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, which is a separate lawsuit from K.R.D.
v. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC et al. This motion was likely related to the ongoing litigation, but the specifics are not.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied a motion in the case of K.R.D. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC, which means the plaintiff's request for a specific action was rejected. This decision is significant because it will impact the progression of the case.
The court's ruling.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants was filed.
The court has denied a motion in the case of Maier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, which is a separate lawsuit from K.R.D. v. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC et al. This motion was likely related to the ongoing litigation, but the specifics are not provided. The denial of the motion means that the plaintiffs' claims will proceed as previously scheduled.
The court denied a motion in the case of K.R.D. v. Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC, which means the plaintiff's request for a specific action was rejected. This decision is significant because it will impact the progression of the case. The court's ruling will likely influence the plaintiff's next steps.
Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants (CV-134) - optional html form ( 7
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
5 hours, 8 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.