civil-litigation federal-courts

Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC

26-cv-05129 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC is a civil matter before the Northern District of Illinois. A declaration has been filed in the case. This document typically contains sworn statements of fact relevant to a legal dispute.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Declarations
  • Sworn testimony
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cv-05129 WILLIAMS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD et al

Other · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Market Express LLC, ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD, Hamilton Co., Jewelers and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 14 hours ago

Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 26-cv-05129.

The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-05129 WILLIAMS and 3:26-cv-05129 Sweitzer on one side and Hamilton Co., Jewelers, Market Express LLC, and ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a other: 1:26-cv-05129 WILLIAMS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD et al. On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has referenced a separate case, Wilson v. The Hamilton Co., Jewelers, in the context of Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC. This indicates that the court is drawing a connection between the two cases, possibly for the purpose of establishing a precedent.

On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: An affidavit was filed.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 7, 2026

1:26-cv-05129 WILLIAMS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD et al

1:26-cv-05129 WILLIAMS v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD et al.

info
Other May 4, 2026

1:26-cv-05129 Wilson v. The Hamilton Co., Jewelers

The court has referenced a separate case, Wilson v. The Hamilton Co., Jewelers, in the context of Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC. This indicates that the court is drawing a connection between the two cases, possibly for the purpose of establishing a precedent or making a comparison. The exact nature of this connection is unclear at this time.

info
Other April 29, 2026

3:26-cv-05129 Sweitzer v. Market Express LLC

An affidavit was filed.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

19 hours, 47 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.