Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

Gerding is seeking costs from the American Kennel Club in a federal lawsuit. The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, is docketed as 21-cv-07958. Costs have been taxed in the case.

Southern District of New York

Civil case in S.D.N.Y. currently marked active.

District of Columbia

Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active.

District of Massachusetts

Civil case in D. Mass. currently marked active.

Northern District of California

Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Northern District of California

Multidistrict Litigation case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Northern District of California

Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Central District of California

Civil case in C.D. Cal. currently marked active.

District of Colorado

In Re: Branded Operations Holdings, Inc. is a civil case under docket 26-cv-01033 involving miscellaneous relief motions. The case likely concerns corporate or commercial matters related to Branded Operations Holdings, Inc. The filing of miscellaneous relief indicates requests for court orders that may affect the

District of Columbia

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has filed an application under docket 26-cv-00416. The recent docket activity notes pro hac vice fee payments for two attorneys, indicating out-of-state counsel involvement. The nature of the application or underlying dispute is not specified in the summary provided.

Central District of California

Rhambo v. Arellano is a civil case with docket number 26-cv-02602. The current summary is an extension of time to answer with 30 days or less. This document outlines the court's decision to grant an extension of time for the defendant to respond to the complaint. The extension of time is a critical component of the

Western District of Washington

Dias v. Columbia Bank is a civil case with docket number 26-cv-05428. The current summary is not available. This lack of information makes it difficult to assess the risk or potential outcomes of the case.

Central District of California

USA v. Trujillo is a criminal case with docket number 26-cr-00253. The current summary is a jurisdiction/treaty transfer-in with 2 pages. This document outlines the court's decision to transfer the case to a different jurisdiction or treaty. The jurisdiction/treaty transfer-in is a critical component of the case, as

Central District of California

USA v. Navarrete-Contreras et al is a case currently pending in an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 24-cr-00734. The current status of the case is that a miscellaneous document has been filed. This lack of information makes it difficult to assess the risk or potential outcomes of the case.

Northern District of California

The case of USA v. Zavalidroga is currently pending, with no further information available on the matter. The court has not provided any updates or decisions. This lack of information makes it difficult to assess the risk or potential outcomes of the case.

Western District of Washington

Jobanputra v. Kim et al is a civil case with an unknown court and docket number 21-cv-07071. The current summary is a Memorandum & Opinion with 117 pages. This document outlines the court's decision and reasoning in the case. The Memorandum & Opinion is a critical component of the case, as it provides clarity on the

Northern District of California

Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit (29 pages) is the current summary for Magana-Torres v. Borla et al. This notice indicates that the plaintiff is appealing a decision made by the lower court. The rand appeal will be heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Western District of Washington

Murillo v. Walmart Inc. is a case with unknown court information. The current summary is about the designation of record, which is a document that outlines the scope of the case. This document is 17 pages long. The designation of record is a key step in the case, as it helps to establish the scope of the litigation

This case involves a dispute between Anthony Lopez and CBE Extreme Nightlife FW LLC, dba Old School Texas. The court's decision is not publicly available, and the case details are unknown. The court's ruling is likely to have significant implications for Lopez' rights and the business' responsibilities towards him.

This case involves a dispute between JPMorgan Chase Bank NA DBA Chase Bank and the State of Texas. The details of the case are currently unknown. The court and docket numbers are also unknown. Further information is needed to provide a more detailed summary.