2:26-cv-02602 Rhambo v. Arellano
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 13
Rhambo v. Arellano is a civil case with docket number 26-cv-02602. The current summary is an extension of time to answer with 30 days or less. This document outlines the court's decision to grant an extension of time for the defendant to respond to the complaint. The extension of time is a critical component of the case, as it affects the timeline and potential outcomes of the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-02602 Rhambo v. Arellano
Other · Apr 27, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Rhambo v. Arellano is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-02602.
The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant, Arellano, was granted an extension to file a response to the complaint in the Rhambo v. Arellano case, with a new deadline set within 30 days. This extension was granted by the court, allowing Arellano more time to prepare a response.
The.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The defendant, Arellano, was granted an extension to file a response to the complaint in the Rhambo v. Arellano case, with a new deadline set within 30 days. This extension was granted by the court, allowing Arellano more time to prepare a response. The extension is a common courtesy in civil cases, giving parties more time to gather evidence and prepare their arguments.
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 13
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.