civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Rhambo v. Arellano

26-cv-02602 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Rhambo v. Arellano is a civil case with docket number 26-cv-02602. The current summary is an extension of time to answer with 30 days or less. This document outlines the court's decision to grant an extension of time for the defendant to respond to the complaint. The extension of time is a critical component of the case, as it affects the timeline and potential outcomes of the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • extension of time
  • court's decision
  • potential outcomes
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-02602 Rhambo v. Arellano

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 11 hours, 58 minutes ago

Rhambo v. Arellano is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-02602.

The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant, Arellano, was granted an extension to file a response to the complaint in the Rhambo v. Arellano case, with a new deadline set within 30 days. This extension was granted by the court, allowing Arellano more time to prepare a response.

The.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-02602 Rhambo v. Arellano

The defendant, Arellano, was granted an extension to file a response to the complaint in the Rhambo v. Arellano case, with a new deadline set within 30 days. This extension was granted by the court, allowing Arellano more time to prepare a response. The extension is a common courtesy in civil cases, giving parties more time to gather evidence and prepare their arguments.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 58 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.