Murillo v. Walmart Inc.
Case Summary
Murillo v. Walmart Inc. is a case with unknown court information. The current summary is about the designation of record, which is a document that outlines the scope of the case. This document is 17 pages long.
Latest development
1:25-cv-02632 Murillo v. Walmart Inc.
Order · April 23, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Designation of Record
- • Unknown Court Information
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief ( 54
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
4 events8:25-cv-02632 In Re Jeffrey Scott Liolios
The court designated the record in the case In Re Jeffrey Scott Liolios, which is a separate matter from Murillo v. Walmart Inc. This designation is a procedural step that involves identifying the documents and evidence that will be used in the case. The designation of record is a key step in the litigation process.
3:25-cv-05933 Hogan v Walmart Inc
The court terminated the case of Hogan v. Walmart Inc. (3:25-cv-05933) due to a lack of activity. This means that the case is now closed and will no longer be actively pursued. The termination of this case does not affect the ongoing case of Murillo v.
5:24-cv-00762 Ruben Mejia v. Walmart Inc.
A scheduling notice was filed in the case of Ruben Mejia v. Walmart Inc. (5:24-cv-00762), which is a separate case from Murillo v. This notice is a routine procedural step to schedule the case for further proceedings. The exact timing and details of the proceedings are not specified in the notice.
1:25-cv-02632 Murillo v. Walmart Inc.
A Motion was filed.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-02632 Murillo v. Walmart Inc.
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief ( 54
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 2 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.