Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Mansoori v. Squires et al, docket number 21-cv-05881, the court issued an order regarding a motion for an extension of time. The motion sought additional time for a party to comply with a procedural requirement or deadline in the litigation. The court's order addresses whether the extension was granted

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Benjamin v. Debt Freedom Attorneys, PLLC, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant law firm, Debt Freedom Attorneys, PLLC. The case reached a procedural stage where the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 3:25-cv-15822 SAMROCK STABLES, LLC et al v. CLARK et al, the plaintiffs, Samrock Stables, LLC and associated parties, have filed a brief in opposition to a motion presented by the defendants, Clark and others. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the filing indicates ongoing litigation

Central District of California

In the case 2:20-cv-03444 Skye Orthobiologics, LLC et al v. CTM Biomedical, LLC et al, the parties reached a settlement resolving their dispute. The litigation involved claims between Skye Orthobiologics and CTM Biomedical, likely concerning business or contractual issues given the parties' industry focus. The

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled Braun et al v. Day et al, docket number 23-cv-16856, involves plaintiffs Braun and others filing suit against defendants Day and others. The available information indicates that counsel for one party has appeared pro hac vice, suggesting involvement of out-of-state attorneys. However, specific factual

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Brown v. AGI Cargo, LLC, docket number 24-cv-07611, the court issued a judgment as reflected in document number 27. While specific details of the claims and factual background are not provided, the case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Brown, and the defendant, AGI Cargo, LLC. The judgment

Northern District of Illinois

In Re: Delta Dental Antitrust Litigation, docket number 19-cv-06734, involves allegations of antitrust violations within the dental insurance industry. The case centers on claims that Delta Dental engaged in anti-competitive practices that may have harmed competitors and consumers by restricting competition in the

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Mann v. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd et al, the plaintiff has initiated litigation against Nissan Motor Co. Ltd and potentially other defendants. The docket number 24-cv-50075 indicates a recent filing, but specific details of the claims or allegations remain sealed and are not publicly available. As a result, the

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Smith v. Exchange Credit Program, the plaintiff, Smith, has filed a complaint against Exchange Credit Program alleging unspecified grievances related to credit or financial services. The complaint initiates litigation seeking remedies for the plaintiff's claims, though specific factual details and legal

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled USA v. Mittal, docket number 23-cr-00648, involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Mittal. While specific details of the charges are not provided, the docket entry referenced pertains to the setting or resetting of deadlines and hearings, indicating ongoing procedural management within the

Northern District of California

The case titled Gallagher v. City and County of San Francisco et al, docket number 23-cv-03579, involves litigation against the City and County of San Francisco and other defendants. The current filing pertains to a procedural matter concerning the notice of appearance, substitution, change, or withdrawal of an

Northern District of California

In the case 4:24-cv-05826 Shaw v. Garcia et al, the plaintiff Shaw has filed a motion to quash, which typically seeks to nullify or void a subpoena or legal process issued by the opposing party. The details of the motion and the underlying dispute are not fully disclosed, but the filing indicates a procedural

Northern District of California

The case titled Khanna et al v. Walia et al, docket number 24-cv-03716, appears to involve procedural matters related to setting deadlines and hearings. While specific substantive claims are not detailed, the notation ' ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings ' suggests that the litigation is currently focused on managing the

Central District of California

In the case of Alexander Stross v. Pinterest, Inc. et al, the plaintiff initiated litigation against Pinterest and associated parties. The docket entry referenced concerns a procedural motion seeking an extension of time for the defendants to file their answer, extending beyond the standard 30-day period. This

Northern District of California

In the case titled District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Integrity Company, Inc., dba Integrity Painting et al, the plaintiffs sought enforcement of a writ of execution. This legal action typically follows a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs

Central District of California

In the case of Global Weather Productions, LLC v. Diverse Insurance Solutions, Inc., docket number 24-cv-10758, the parties are engaged in a legal dispute involving contractual or business-related issues. The case is currently before an unspecified court, and recent activity includes an order issued as document number

Northern District of California

The case titled USA v. Liew et al, docket number 11-cr-00573, involves criminal proceedings against multiple defendants. While specific details of the charges and facts are not provided, the case appears to be part of a federal criminal prosecution given the docket number format and parties involved. The referenced

Northern District of California

The case titled USA v. Ajayi, docket number 24-mj-70020, involves a criminal matter before an unspecified court. The available document is a stipulation and proposed order, indicating that the parties have reached an agreement on certain procedural or substantive issues in the case. Such stipulations often aim to

Northern District of California

In the case 4:24-cv-02142 Watson v. National Gypsum Company et al, the parties participated in a telephone conference as part of the ongoing litigation process. Specific details regarding the nature of the dispute, claims, or defenses have not been disclosed. The case involves the plaintiff, Watson, bringing claims

Central District of California

In the case 5:20-cv-01054 Clearly Clean Products LLC et al v. Eco Food Pak USA Inc et al, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed one or more parties from the litigation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This procedural action indicates that the plaintiffs chose to discontinue claims against certain