Browse Cases

Central District of California

In the case titled Eric Gee v. Nola Grannis et al, docket number 09-cv-07413, the plaintiff Eric Gee initiated legal proceedings against Nola Grannis and other defendants. The case involves a financial entry related to an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee, indicating that the plaintiff sought to proceed without

Southern District of Florida

The case 1:25-cv-24863 THE GOURMET CRAB INC v. D&D Seafood Corporation et al involves a dispute between two seafood companies. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the litigation likely centers on commercial issues such as contract disputes, business practices, or supply agreements within the seafood

Central District of California

The case 2:25-cv-11395, Richard Deweese v. Paylocity Corporation et al, involves a dispute brought by Richard Deweese against Paylocity Corporation and other defendants. The matter is currently at the stage of a settlement conference, indicating that the parties are exploring resolution options outside of trial.

Southern District of Florida

In the case titled Chen v. 2022 Nautique Runabout et al, docket number 26-cv-21414, the court issued an order dismissing or closing the case or a party involved. The specifics of the claims or parties affected by the dismissal are not provided. This procedural order effectively ends the litigation or removes a party

Southern District of Florida

In the case 0:26-cv-60490 Viera v. Apotex Corp., the plaintiff, Viera, has filed a reply in support of a motion, indicating ongoing litigation between the parties. The case involves a dispute with Apotex Corp., a pharmaceutical company, though specific details about the nature of the claim or the motion are not

Southern District of Florida

The case 3:23-cv-22078 Allen v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al involves a substitution of counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties. Specific details about the underlying dispute or claims are not provided in the available information. The docket entry referenced pertains solely to

Southern District of Florida

In the case titled Miranda v. South East Personnel Leasing, Inc. and Florida Beauty Flora, Inc., docket number 25-cv-21738, the court issued an order dismissing or closing the case or a party involved. The specific reasons for dismissal or closure are not provided, and the court in which the case was filed is unknown.

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:25-cv-21914 Ojito et al v. Raymond Global, Inc, the court issued an order regarding a motion to extend the discovery cutoff deadline. The parties involved sought additional time to complete discovery, which is the pre-trial phase where both sides exchange relevant information and evidence. The court's

Southern District of Florida

In the case 4:26-cv-10010 FINATIX SPORTFISHING OF THE UPPER KEYS, LLC et al v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE OF FLORIDA, LLC, the plaintiffs, Finatix Sportfishing of the Upper Keys, LLC and others, have brought a legal action against Interstate Commerce of Florida, LLC. The specific claims and factual background of the dispute

Northern District of California

The case 3:25-cv-04305 Lastorina-Snyder v. Correctional Facility Elmwood et al involves a plaintiff, Lastorina-Snyder, bringing claims against the Correctional Facility Elmwood and associated defendants. The docket entry referenced pertains to a procedural motion seeking an extension of time to file a document

Northern District of California

In the case of Lorrie Herman v. Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc., the plaintiff, Lorrie Herman, has brought a civil action against the defendant, Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc. The case involves a Joint Case Management Statement, indicating ongoing procedural coordination between the parties. While specific factual

Northern District of California

The case of USA v. Andrews involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Andrews. The available docket entry references a utility motion related to setting or resetting deadlines and hearings, indicating procedural management within the case.

Northern District of California

In the case titled Williams v. Recovery Innovations Inc et al, docket number 24-cv-05496, the court has issued a notice of hearing on a motion filed within the litigation. While specific details about the parties' claims or defenses are not provided, the notice indicates ongoing procedural activity in the case. The

Northern District of California

In the case 5:25-cv-10967 Flagship Facility Services LLC v. Whayne & Sons Enterprises, Inc., the parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed order to the court. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the filing indicates ongoing procedural or substantive negotiations between the plaintiff

Northern District of California

In the case Griffin v. Henkel US Operations Corporation, docket number 25-cv-06069, the court issued an order related to the ongoing litigation between the plaintiff, Griffin, and the defendant, Henkel US Operations Corporation. While specific details of the order are not provided, the case involves a dispute likely

Northern District of California

The case 4:26-mj-70401-1 USA v. Campos-Sanchez involves a federal matter identified by the docket number 26-mj-70401. The court issued an order concerning a PS8 memorandum, which typically relates to a pretrial services report used to assess conditions for release or detention of the defendant. While specific details

Northern District of California

The case titled USA v. Arambula, docket number 26-xr-90082, involves federal criminal proceedings against the defendant Arambula. The available information pertains primarily to procedural matters, specifically the setting and resetting of deadlines and hearings as part of case management. No substantive details

Central District of California

In the case 2:07-cv-04042 Efrain Salinas v. C M Harrison et al, the plaintiff, Efrain Salinas, initiated legal action against defendants including C M Harrison. The docket entry references a financial matter concerning the filing fee under the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status, which allows a party to proceed without

District of New Jersey

In the case of USA v. Lopez-Gomera, docket number 25-mj-09290, the court addressed a motion concerning the continuance of speedy trial deadlines. The defendant, Lopez-Gomera, is involved in proceedings where the timely commencement of trial is governed by statutory speedy trial rules. The court's consideration of a

District of New Jersey

The case 1:24-cv-09232 BLAIR v. COREMEDIA CORPORATION involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Blair, and the defendant, CoreMedia Corporation. The docket includes a letter filed as document 35, which may pertain to procedural or substantive matters in the litigation. Specific details about the claims or