Browse Cases

Central District of California

The case titled 1:25-cv-15242 GONZALEZ v. AMAZON.COM SERVICE LLC et al involves a plaintiff, Gonzalez, bringing a lawsuit against Amazon.com Service LLC and potentially other defendants. The docket entry referenced is a Notice of Appearance, indicating that counsel has formally entered their appearance in the case.

Central District of California

The case American Heart Technologies, LLC et al v. Amirhossein Jaberzadeh Ansari et al, docket number 22-cv-08387, is a civil litigation matter. The available information is limited to a scheduling notice, which outlines procedural timelines or court dates. No substantive details about the claims, defenses, or factual

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-08148 Glen Blough v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. et al, plaintiff Glen Blough has filed a lawsuit against XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. and additional defendants. The available information primarily concerns procedural aspects of the litigation, including motions related to the setting and resetting

Central District of California

In the case of Patricia Ann Robinson v. Kilolo Kijakazi, docket number 22-cv-08519, the court issued an In Chambers Order or Directive without holding a formal proceeding. The case appears to involve a dispute between the plaintiff, Patricia Ann Robinson, and the defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi, though specific details of

Central District of California

The case 1:23-cv-15139 Slawomir v. United States Postal Service et al involves a plaintiff named Slawomir bringing claims against the United States Postal Service and potentially other defendants. Specific details about the nature of the dispute are limited, but the docket entry referenced indicates a motion to strike

Central District of California

In the case titled Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Garrison Demolition and Engineering, Inc., docket number 25-cv-11722, the plaintiff sought relief against the defendant, Garrison Demolition and Engineering, Inc. The case resulted in a default judgment, indicating

Central District of California

The parties have given their final consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge in the case Jennifer Trujillo v. Frank Bisignano. This procedural step allows the magistrate judge to conduct all further proceedings, including trial and entry of judgment, with the parties' agreement.

Central District of California

In the case of Edward M. Malloy v. Alex Villanueva et al, docket number 22-cv-04836, the plaintiff has initiated legal proceedings against Alex Villanueva and other defendants. The case primarily concerns procedural issues related to the scheduling or rescheduling of court hearings. While the substantive claims

Central District of California

The case 8:25-mj-00784-1 USA v. Lorenzana-Cano involves the United States government as the plaintiff and Lorenzana-Cano as the defendant. It is an active civil matter, though specific details regarding the claims or nature of the dispute have not been publicly disclosed.

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-08080, Kevin Christopher Dunston has filed a lawsuit against the State of California and other defendants. The docket entry referenced pertains to a procedural matter involving the setting or resetting of deadlines within the litigation process. Specific substantive claims or factual allegations

Central District of California

The case Manuel Zafra v. RSCR California, Inc. et al, docket number 25-cv-08676, involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff Manuel Zafra and the defendant RSCR California, Inc. While the exact nature of the claims or issues in the case is not detailed in the available records, an In Chambers Order or Directive has

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-06828 Gerald R. Steik, Jr. et al v. City of Redondo Beach et al, the plaintiffs have submitted a status report regarding ongoing litigation against the City of Redondo Beach and other defendants. Although specific claims and factual allegations are not detailed, the filing reflects active case

Central District of California

USA v. Streng is a criminal case involving the defendant Streng. The available information primarily reflects procedural activity, including the setting and resetting of deadlines and hearings as part of case management. No substantive details about the charges or factual background are provided in the record reviewed.

District of Colorado

In the case 1:24-cv-02853 Rubio Flores et al v. J&T Harvesting LLC et al, the plaintiffs have filed a motion to amend, correct, or modify a prior filing or court order. This procedural step indicates active litigation where the parties seek to update or clarify pleadings or court documents. Although the specific

District of Colorado

In Peace v. Panorama Consulting Solutions LLC, the court considered a motion filed by an attorney seeking to withdraw from representing a party in the litigation. The court's order evaluated whether the withdrawal could be permitted by examining key factors such as the client's consent to the withdrawal, the potential

Central District of California

The case 2:24-cv-06100 Remet Alcohols, Inc. v. Valley of the Sun Cosmetics, LLC involves a commercial dispute between two business entities. Remet Alcohols, Inc. is the plaintiff, and Valley of the Sun Cosmetics, LLC is the defendant. Although specific details of the dispute have not been disclosed, the parties have

Central District of California

In the case of Philice Scovell v. City of Beverly Hills et al, the plaintiff, Philice Scovell, has initiated legal proceedings against the City of Beverly Hills and associated defendants. The case docket number is 25-cv-00280. Although specific details of the claims are not provided, the filing of a Notice of Lodging

Central District of California

In the civil case 5:23-cv-01986, plaintiff Maribelle Ruiz has initiated legal action against CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. and additional defendants. While the specific claims and allegations have not been publicly disclosed, the lawsuit involves issues related to CarMax's business operations, likely touching on

Central District of California

In the case of Janie Williams et al v. Promedica Employment Services, LLC et al, the plaintiffs initiated a lawsuit against Promedica Employment Services and other defendants in federal court under docket number 24-cv-00190. The nature of the claims is not detailed, but the case involved employment-related issues

Central District of California

The case 3:20-cv-07978 Center for Medical Progress et al v. Xavier Becerra et al involves plaintiffs Center for Medical Progress and others challenging actions taken by Xavier Becerra, presumably in his official capacity. The litigation centers on disputes related to medical or regulatory issues, as suggested by the