Browse Cases

Central District of California

Floyd J. Mayweather initiated a civil lawsuit against Showtime Networks Inc. and other defendants. The summons and complaint have been formally served, indicating the defendants have been notified and the case is progressing beyond the initial filing stage. No further details on claims or defenses are available, but

Central District of California

The United States government has initiated a criminal prosecution against Powell and others. The case is ongoing and has attracted media attention, indicating matters of public interest or significance are involved.

Central District of California

This civil case involves the Southern California Drug Benefit Fund and other plaintiffs suing OC Dental Corp and additional defendants. The dispute centers on financial or contractual issues, as evidenced by the use of a judgment debtor examination to identify the debtor's assets for enforcing a court judgment. Such

Central District of California

This entry duplicates case 2577 and concerns the same multidistrict litigation involving Kia engine defects. It similarly reflects ongoing procedural matters, including court orders rejecting filings due to document discrepancies. The case remains a complex product liability MDL with multiple parties and extensive

Central District of California

In the case 8:25-cv-02599 Monica Coulson v. Westlake Services, LLC et al, the court issued an order referring the matter to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). The referral suggests that the parties are encouraged to explore settlement or mediation options to resolve their dispute outside of traditional litigation.

Central District of California

This civil case involves Anaru Endeavors, Inc. and others suing Merrick Bank Corporation and additional defendants. The court has issued a protective order to safeguard confidential information during the litigation process. This indicates that sensitive business or financial data is central to the dispute. The case

District of Colorado

In Codding v. Dixon et al, the court issued a default judgment after the defendants failed to respond or appear, granting the plaintiff the requested relief and resolving the claims without trial. This judgment finalizes the case in favor of the plaintiff based on the defendants' default, demonstrating the

District of Colorado

Birch (PS) v. Wunderle et al is an active civil case with limited publicly available information. The case remains under litigation with no detailed facts or claims disclosed, and no recent substantive updates have been reported.

District of Colorado

Haze v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company is a dispute involving the plaintiff and an insurance provider, focusing on issues likely related to insurance claims. The court has issued an order concerning a motion to amend, correct, or modify prior pleadings or orders, signaling procedural refinements in

District of Colorado

Puckett (PS) v. Washington County Jail is a civil case involving a plaintiff challenging conditions or treatment at a county jail. The case is currently at a procedural stage where the court has addressed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing the plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of fees due

District of Colorado

This entry duplicates the case Weinfeld v. City of Durango et al and similarly notes the presence of a judicial memorandum. The case remains in a phase where judicial analysis is being documented, with no new substantive developments reported. The duplication does not affect the procedural status or underlying issues

District of Colorado

In Atkins v. American Family Insurance Company et al, the parties have jointly consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to oversee the case proceedings. This agreement allows the magistrate judge to handle various aspects of the litigation, including pretrial motions, discovery issues, and possibly the

District of Colorado

This record duplicates the case Male Excel Medical, P.A. et al v. Trexler et al, highlighting an order referring a motion within the civil litigation. Details on the motion or case claims are not provided. The procedural activity reflects ongoing judicial oversight and case progression, though substantive issues

District of Colorado

This entry duplicates the case Warren v. Fidelity National Title Company, reflecting the court's consideration of a motion for an extension of time to file documents. The case remains active with procedural motions being addressed, indicating ongoing litigation activity. No substantive claims or factual details are

District of Colorado

The case Meadows v. American Airlines, Inc., docket number 24-cv-20518, involves an appeal that has been forwarded to the United States Court of Appeals (USCA). While specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, the appeal indicates that a party dissatisfied with a prior decision in the district court

District of Colorado

This entry duplicates the procedural update in Wiggins et al v. Endless Concepts Contracting, LLC et al, reflecting routine case management activity. No new information or substantive progress has been reported beyond the initial minute order. The nature of the dispute and claims remain undisclosed.

District of Colorado

In the criminal case of USA v. Martinez, et al, the government filed a response opposing a motion submitted by the defense. While specific details of the motion are not provided, the opposition indicates ongoing litigation over procedural or substantive issues in this multi-defendant federal criminal matter.

District of Colorado

GS Holistic, LLC v. Pipe Joint, The LLC et al currently involves procedural motions concerning extensions of time to file documents. The court's order addresses adjustments to filing deadlines, focusing on managing the litigation schedule rather than the substantive issues of the dispute. No rulings on the merits have

District of Colorado

In the case of Simpson v. Walgreen Co. et al, docket number 23-cv-16465, the primary procedural event recorded is the withdrawal of an attorney representing one of the parties. The case details, including the underlying claims or causes of action, are not provided in the available information. The withdrawal of

District of Colorado

Private Capital Management, LLC v. Crusonia Wealth Advisors, LLC et al currently reflects a procedural docket update without substantive content. The entry duplicates a procedural minute order, indicating no new developments in the underlying dispute. The case remains in its existing procedural posture, with no