Browse Cases

• Filed

This case is a duplicate entry of Cruz v. The District Attorney et al, reflecting the same procedural filing regarding consent or declination to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. The duplication suggests multiple filings or docket entries related to this procedural matter. No additional substantive information

• Filed

Cruz v. The District Attorney et al includes a procedural filing regarding the parties' consent or declination to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This decision affects how the case will be managed and adjudicated, as magistrate judges handle pretrial matters and, with consent, may conduct trials. The case

• Filed

McWilliams v. Rojas involves a procedural notice concerning the plaintiff's in forma pauperis (IFP) status, which allows a party to proceed without paying court fees due to financial hardship. This notice indicates the court's acknowledgment or action regarding the IFP application. The case details are limited, but

• Filed

In Re: N-S Sound Treaty All, et al, similarly records a notice of withdrawal of counsel. This procedural event signals a change in legal representation within a case likely involving treaty or tribal matters, as suggested by the title. The specifics of the claims or issues remain unspecified. Such a withdrawal can

• Filed

In Re: Steelhead Management Plan, et al, involves a procedural development marked by a notice of withdrawal of counsel. This indicates a change in legal representation for one or more parties involved in the case. The nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed, but the case number suggests it may relate to

• Filed

This case, Endicott-Quinones v. Hinter-NM, LLC et al, is identified as a member case within a multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceeding. The docket indicates it is a recent opening under a conditional transfer order (CTO), suggesting coordination with related cases for pretrial proceedings to improve efficiency and

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

Pugh has initiated a civil lawsuit against Wellpath LLC and others, docketed as 23-cv-03677. The latest procedural update notes the termination of hearings, which may indicate a pause or potential resolution in the case.

• Filed

This entry duplicates case 5872, involving Washington v. Unifin, Inc. The case shows termination of hearings as the latest procedural update, indicating a potential pause or conclusion in the litigation process.

• Filed

Washington has filed a lawsuit against Unifin, Inc., with the case docketed as 25-cv-07689. The latest procedural note indicates that hearings have been terminated, suggesting a possible resolution or procedural pause in the litigation.

• Filed

The case titled Indian Halibut Share and others involves parties likely engaged in a dispute related to fishing rights or resource allocation. The most recent procedural update is a notice of withdrawal of counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one party.

• Filed

This case involves Alaska Sockeye and others, with limited information available. The latest docket entry is a notice of withdrawal of counsel, signaling a change in legal representation. The nature of the dispute is unclear from the available data.

• Filed

This case involves the S'Klallam RFD Halibu and others against the Lummi Indian Tribe. The matter appears to be related to tribal or indigenous rights, given the parties involved. The most recent procedural update is a notice of withdrawal of counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties.

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

The Quileute Indian Tribe and others are engaged in litigation against the State of Washington, with recent docket entries indicating a notice of withdrawal of counsel. The case likely involves tribal-state disputes, possibly concerning land or jurisdictional issues. The withdrawal may affect case management and

• Filed

This entry duplicates the case of Loera, Jr. et al. v. County of Alameda, reflecting similar procedural activity related to motions and scheduling. The case remains in an active litigation phase with court management of upcoming deadlines and hearings.

• Filed

Loera, Jr. and others have filed suit against the County of Alameda, with recent docket activity focusing on setting motions, deadlines, and hearings. This indicates the case is in an active pretrial phase, with procedural scheduling underway to manage the litigation timeline.