Browse Cases

• Filed

This civil case involves plaintiffs Jang and others against Jake SB, Inc. and additional defendants. The matter is currently in early stages with limited publicly available information regarding the specific claims or motions filed. The docket number is 25-cv-02383, but the court is unspecified.

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

This entry duplicates the case Goodwin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. under docket 24-cv-05655 with an amended complaint filed. The information mirrors that of case 4740, indicating ongoing civil litigation involving T-Mobile USA, Inc. with updated pleadings by the plaintiff.

• Filed

Goodwin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., docket number 24-cv-05655, is a civil lawsuit involving an amended complaint filed by the plaintiff. The case likely concerns consumer or employment issues related to T-Mobile USA, Inc. Specific allegations are not detailed, but the amendment indicates evolving claims or factual

• Filed

Laborers' Local Union Nos. 472 & 172 et al v. Statewide Construction is a civil case filed under docket number 26-cv-03870. The case involves labor unions as plaintiffs against a construction company defendant. Recent docket activity includes setting and resetting motions and deadlines, indicating ongoing procedural

• Filed

Hitrons Tech Inc. v. Bodyfriend, Co., Ltd. is a civil litigation matter under docket number 25-cv-16128. The dispute likely centers on technology or intellectual property issues between the plaintiff, Hitrons Tech Inc., and the defendant, Bodyfriend, Co., Ltd. Specific details of claims or defenses are not provided.

• Filed

Webber v. SAG-AFTRA et al is a civil case filed under docket number 26-cv-03003. The available record includes a memorandum opposing a motion, indicating active procedural disputes between the parties. The case likely involves issues related to labor or union matters given the involvement of SAG-AFTRA, a prominent

• Filed

Noonan v. OpenText Corporation et al is a civil lawsuit filed under docket number 24-cv-01908. The case involves claims against OpenText Corporation and possibly other defendants, though specific allegations and procedural posture are not detailed in the available information. The parties are engaged in litigation

• Filed

Criminal case currently marked active.

• Filed

TD Bank, N.A. v. City of Passaic et al involves a proposed order, indicating ongoing judicial consideration of motions or case management issues. The case likely concerns a dispute between a financial institution and a municipal entity, possibly involving contractual or financial matters. Details on the substantive

• Filed

This entry duplicates Webb v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., with a summons issued to commence litigation. No additional substantive information is available. The case remains at an early procedural stage.

• Filed

Webb v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. has reached the stage where a summons has been issued, marking the formal start of the lawsuit. The case involves a consumer finance company, suggesting potential issues related to lending or credit. Further information about claims or defenses is not provided.

• Filed

This entry duplicates the Luzine v. Pujari case, with a summons issued signaling the start of litigation. No additional substantive information is available beyond the procedural step of notifying the defendant. The case remains in its initial phase.

• Filed

In Luzine v. Pujari, a summons has been issued, indicating the formal commencement of litigation. The case appears to be at an initial stage, with the plaintiff having initiated the lawsuit and the defendant being notified to respond. Further details about the nature of the dispute are not provided.

• Filed

This case, Gardner v. Combs et al, is currently in the pretrial phase with hearings being set or reset. The docket indicates ongoing procedural activity but lacks substantive details about the claims or defenses involved. The parties appear to be preparing for further litigation steps, possibly including motions or

• Filed

Civil case currently marked active.

• Filed

Lausell has initiated a civil action against Plumeri. The docket references a Notice (Other), but no substantive details about the claims or issues are provided. The case appears to be in preliminary procedural stages without further information on the dispute.

• Filed

This entry duplicates case 4756, involving the USA v. Bennett et al. criminal prosecution. The docket notes an Order on a Motion for Continuance of Speedy Trial Deadlines, reflecting procedural developments in trial scheduling.

• Filed

This criminal case involves the United States government prosecuting Bennett and others. The docket reflects an Order on a Motion for Continuance of Speedy Trial Deadlines, indicating procedural adjustments likely due to case complexity or preparation needs. The case is in early stages with trial scheduling issues

• Filed

This case is a duplicate filing of Bernard v. Comport Consulting Corp., with the same docket number and no additional information available. It likely pertains to the same civil dispute as case 4754.