Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — updated every 30 minutes from official court records via PACER and CourtListener. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
5400 cases tracked · 5400 currently active
Filters
Showing 20 of 5400 cases
• Filed
SUNKARA et al v. BELLMAWR PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al is a newly filed civil case with no available docket entries or summaries. The parties involved suggest a dispute potentially related to educational or employment matters within the public school system.
• Filed
This case, Robert Platt et al v. Sodexo, S.A. et al, involves plaintiffs bringing claims against Sodexo and related parties. The docket entry currently available is a notice, indicating procedural developments but no substantive details on the claims or defenses have been provided.
• Filed
Ameris Bank has initiated litigation against Denver Retina Center, PC and others. The docket entry is generic with no substantive information about claims, defenses, or procedural posture. Without further details, the nature of the dispute and potential legal issues remain unspecified.
• Filed
This case involves PHARHAM and others as plaintiffs against Equifax Information Services LLC and additional defendants. The docket notes a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, indicating the plaintiffs have chosen to dismiss the case without proceeding to trial or judgment. The dismissal suggests resolution or withdrawal of
• Filed
Phuong Lap Nguyen has filed suit against Mark Bowen and others, but no case details or docket activity have been disclosed. The absence of information leaves the nature of the claims and parties involved unclear. The case appears to be in early or unreported stages without substantive public filings.
• Filed
This is a duplicate docket number and title to case 4661, HWANG v. AUTUNNALE et al, with no additional information available. No substantive details or case developments are provided. The case remains in an unreported status with no known claims or procedural updates.
• Filed
This case, titled HWANG v. AUTUNNALE et al, currently lacks publicly available substantive information or docket activity. No summary or details regarding claims, parties' positions, or case status are provided. As a result, the nature of the dispute and relevant legal issues remain unknown at this time.
• Filed
This case involves Sunna Kim as the plaintiff against LG H&H Co., Ltd. The docket indicates procedural activity including a Notice of Assignment to a U.S. Magistrate Judge and a Declination of Consent form, suggesting early case management steps. No substantive allegations or claims are detailed in the available
• Filed
This entry appears to be a duplicate of case 4671, involving The Cincinnati Insurance Company versus Zeltzer. No additional information is provided to distinguish this filing from the prior one.
• Filed
The Cincinnati Insurance Company has initiated a case against Zeltzer. No further information is available regarding the claims or issues involved. The case likely pertains to insurance coverage or related disputes given the plaintiff's identity.
• Filed
This case involves plaintiffs Gary G. et al against defendant Gavin Newsom et al. No summary details are provided, leaving the nature of the claims and legal issues unclear. The parties suggest a possible public or governmental dispute given the named defendant.
• Filed
Ferrara Candy Company is engaged in litigation against American Continental Limited and others. The current docket entry is a memorandum opposing a motion, indicating active motion practice and contested issues between the parties. The nature of the dispute likely involves commercial or contractual matters given the
• Filed
This case is a duplicate filing involving Hidalgo et al against Smith Marchesi et al, with an amended complaint submitted. The details mirror those of case 4667, indicating either a related or duplicate action in the same docket. No further substantive information is provided.
• Filed
This case involves plaintiffs Hidalgo et al who have filed an amended complaint against defendants Smith Marchesi et al. The specifics of the claims and parties' allegations are not detailed in the available summary. The amended complaint suggests ongoing litigation with potential revisions to the original claims or
• Filed
Domi has initiated legal action against Veolia North America, LLC. A status conference has been conducted, which typically addresses case management and procedural scheduling. Specific allegations or claims have not been provided in the summary.
• Filed
Deep Water Recoveries (S) Pte Ltd is pursuing claims related to lost and abandoned silver bullion. The case involves complex issues likely concerning ownership and recovery of valuable assets. A reply brief has been filed in response to an opposition to a motion, indicating active litigation and contested motions.
• Filed
Ocean West Food Services, LLC and others are engaged in litigation against Qi Qiang Huang and additional defendants. A motion in limine has been filed to exclude certain evidence or testimony, indicating pretrial disputes over admissibility. The case details and claims remain unspecified.
• Filed
Emily A. Done has filed a complaint against Lululemon USA Inc. and others. An initial order was issued upon filing the complaint, which is a procedural step confirming the commencement of the case. The specific claims or allegations have not been detailed in the summary provided.
• Filed
Steelpeak Wealth, LLC has filed a lawsuit against John Perry and others. The case record notes an appearance pro hac vice, indicating that an attorney not admitted to the local bar has been granted permission to participate in the case. The nature of the dispute is not specified in the available summary.
• Filed
Valtrus Innovations Ltd. and related parties have initiated litigation against Iron Mountain Data Centers LLC. The case appears to involve corporate matters, as indicated by the filing of a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Specific details regarding the nature of the dispute or claims have not been disclosed in the