Browse Cases

District of Massachusetts

USA v. Lankford et al. is tracked by Juryvine as a criminal case. The available record places the matter in D. Mass.. The docket number on file is 24-cr-10252. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the

Northern District of Illinois

Bros Union Corp. v. The Corporations, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations ldentified on Schedule A is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Ill.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-05652. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or

Northern District of Illinois

Battle v. Thompson Tee, Inc. is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Ill.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-05651. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update

Northern District of Illinois

Battle v. Molton Brown USA LLC is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Ill.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-05650. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will

Northern District of Illinois

Battle v. Haspel, L.L.C. is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Ill.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-05649. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the

Northern District of Illinois

Randolph v. Lime Lush Boutique, LLC is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Ill.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-05648. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will

Northern District of Illinois

Randolph v. Fitflop USA LLC is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in N.D. Ill.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-05647. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update

Southern District of Florida

Emery et al is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in S.D. Fla.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-23413. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as

Southern District of Florida

Tim Hortons USA, Inc. v. GB HWY-7 Brothers, LLC et al is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in S.D. Fla.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-23414. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper

Southern District of Florida

Alvarez San Juan v. NOEM et al is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in S.D. Fla.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-61441. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will

Southern District of Florida

Dougherty v. Ric-Man Construction Florida, Inc. is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in S.D. Fla.. The docket number on file is 26-cv-61446. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis.

District Judge Mark S. Davis granted the plaintiff's motion to appoint a receiver. The court issued a memorandum opinion supporting this decision and indicated that a separate order with details would follow. The opinion was signed on May 14, 2026.

Judge John F. Walter approved non-resident attorney Cindy D. Hanson's application to appear pro hac vice for defendant The Retail Equation, Inc. Ronald Raether was designated as local counsel. The order was entered on March 24, 2026.

Judge John F. Walter granted non-resident attorney David C. Pinkhasov permission to appear pro hac vice for plaintiff Karina Luzanilla. The court also designated Andrew J. Gramajo as local counsel for the plaintiff. This order was entered on March 27, 2026.

The court granted Defendant Kyler Joseph Bard an extension to file his response to the government's opposition to his motion for post-conviction relief. The new deadline for the response is December 5, 2025. This order was signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on November 13, 2025.

Cover Sheet for Amendments to Schedules and or Statements is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source

Final Decree and Case Closed is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the

Amended Schedules A-H, Mailing Matrix is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. An Amended Schedules A was filed. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney

Modify Confirmed Plan is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.

Notice Request (batch) is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.