MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant KYLER JOSEPH BARD's 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Government's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Post Conviction Relief. Response shall be due on or before December 5, 2025. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/13/2025. (lcapm3)
Case Summary
The court granted Defendant Kyler Joseph Bard an extension to file his response to the government's opposition to his motion for post-conviction relief. The new deadline for the response is December 5, 2025. This order was signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on November 13, 2025.
Latest development
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant KYLER JOSEPH BARD's 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Government's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Post Conviction Relief. Response shall be due on or before
Order · May 15, 2026
A Motion for Post Conviction Relief was filed.
Key Issues
- • Extension of time
- • Post-conviction relief
- • Response deadline
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant KYLER JOSEPH BARD's 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Government's
Order · May 15, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Amit P. Mehta
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 15, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Amit P. Mehta.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Judge Amit P. Mehta granted Defendant Kyler Joseph Bard an extension to file his response to the government's opposition to his motion for post-conviction relief. The court set the new deadline for Bard's response on or before December 5, 2025.
This order came on November 13, 2025, reflecting the court’s willingness to allow more time for Bard to address the government's arguments. The case remains active, with the post-conviction relief motion pending. Bard initially filed the motion seeking relief after his conviction, prompting the government to oppose it.
The extension suggests Bard’s counsel requested additional time to prepare a thorough reply, possibly to address complex legal or factual issues raised by the government. The court has not indicated any change to the underlying schedule beyond this extension.
The next key step will be Bard’s submission of his response by the new deadline, which will determine how the court proceeds with the post-conviction relief motion. Judge Mehta’s order does not resolve the motion itself but keeps the case moving forward.
The docket does not specify the original filing dates or the court’s jurisdiction, but the procedural posture centers on the post-conviction relief phase. This stage often involves detailed legal arguments about the validity of the conviction or sentence, making timely responses critical.
The government’s opposition and Bard’s forthcoming reply will shape the court’s decision on whether to grant any relief.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant KYLER JOSEPH BARD's 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Government's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Post Conviction Relief. Response shall be due on or before December 5, 2025. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/13/2025. (lcapm3)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventMINUTE ORDER granting Defendant KYLER JOSEPH BARD's 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Government's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Post Conviction Relief. Response shall be due on or before December 5, 2025. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/13/2025. (lcapm3)
A Motion for Post Conviction Relief was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
38 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.