District of New Jersey
USA v. XIL-ARGUETA is a case in the District of New Jersey. The current summary involves a letter requesting information case assignment, which is a routine request. The docket number is 26-cr-00223.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
41659 cases tracked · 41659 currently active
Showing 20 of 33190 matching cases
District of New Jersey
USA v. XIL-ARGUETA is a case in the District of New Jersey. The current summary involves a letter requesting information case assignment, which is a routine request. The docket number is 26-cr-00223.
District of New Jersey
USA v. ROPER is a case in the District of New Jersey. The current summary is not available, and the docket number is 21-cr-00656.
District of Massachusetts
Ivanowski v. Viv Auto Pilot et al is a case in the District of Massachusetts. The current summary involves a leave to file document, which is a routine request. The docket number is 25-cv-40114.
District of Massachusetts
Powers v. Receivable Performance Management, LLC is a case in the District of Massachusetts. The current summary involves an extension of time, which is a routine request. The docket number is 21-cv-12125.
District of Massachusetts
ActBlue LLC et al v. Paxton is a case in the District of Massachusetts. The current summary involves an appearance pro hac vice, which is a routine request. The docket number is 26-cv-11986.
District of Massachusetts
Pollock v. Berkshire County Jail and House of Correction et al is a case in the District of Massachusetts. The current summary involves a letter/request, which is not a motion. The docket number is 23-cv-30131.
District of Massachusetts
Zheng v. Edlow is a case in the District of Massachusetts. The current summary is not available, and the docket number is 26-cv-11987.
District of Massachusetts
Butler v. United States of America is a pretrial services case in the District of Massachusetts. The case involves a request, memo, summons, and warrant related to pretrial services/probation. The docket number is 26-cv-11436.
District of New Jersey
VAPORE has initiated a civil lawsuit against ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY and other defendants in the District of New Jersey. No specific filing details are provided beyond the case title and docket number. The absence of a current summary suggests the case may be newly filed or that recent filings have not yet
Northern District of California
Hostetler has filed a civil action against Driscoll in the Northern District of California. The Clerk's Notice has been filed. This type of notice is typically issued by the court clerk to inform parties of procedural matters, such as deadlines or the status of filings. It suggests the case is undergoing standard
Northern District of California
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is pursuing a civil case against Rothenberg in the Northern District of California. A transcript has been filed, which is a record of spoken proceedings, such as depositions or court hearings. This indicates that evidence is being formally recorded and submitted to the
Southern District of Florida
Chabad Lubavitch of Weston II, Inc. has filed a civil suit against AGCS Marine Insurance Company in the Southern District of Florida. A Scheduling Report for a Rule 26(f)/16.1 conference has been filed. This report outlines the parties' proposed discovery plans and timelines, indicating the case is entering the
Northern District of California
White has filed a civil action against the Florida Department of Corrections in the Northern District of California. The Clerk's Receipt indicates that filing fees, or a portion thereof, have been paid. This filing confirms a procedural requirement for initiating or continuing the lawsuit has been met.
District of New Jersey
A civil case, Osbourne (PS) v. No Named Defendant, is proceeding in the District of New Jersey. The current filing is a Notice of Appearance, confirming that legal counsel is representing a party. This is a routine step in civil litigation, indicating the case is moving forward with legal representation.
District of New Jersey
Bergman Development Partners LLC is involved in a civil dispute with Gravis Law PLLC and others in the District of New Jersey. A Notice of Unavailability has been filed, informing the court that a party or counsel is not available for a specific period. This is a procedural step to manage court dockets and scheduling.
Northern District of California
Jaraba Oliveros brought a civil case against Kaiser and other defendants in the Northern District of California. A supplemental brief has been filed, which typically presents additional arguments or evidence to the court. This filing suggests that the parties are actively engaged in legal arguments, possibly in
Northern District of California
Marsh USA LLC has initiated a civil lawsuit against Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. and other defendants in the Northern District of California. The court has set deadlines and scheduled hearings, signaling that the case is moving through its discovery and pre-trial phases. This suggests active case management by the
District of New Jersey
Fractal Networks LLC filed a civil action against GAO Tek Inc. in the District of New Jersey. The current filing is a Notice of Appearance, indicating legal representation has been formally entered for a party in the case. This suggests the litigation is proceeding with counsel actively involved.
Western District of Washington
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in the case of USA v. Phiri. The docket number for the original case in the Western District of Washington is 22-cr-00122. The order follows a prior filing of 315 pages.
Central District of California
Tyrell Ainsworth sued L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva in the Central District of California. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed a mandate on October 26, 2023. This document conveys the appellate court's final ruling.