2:24-cv-11178 Tyrell Ainsworth v. L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva
USCA Mandate ( 16
Tyrell Ainsworth sued L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva in the Central District of California. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed a mandate on October 26, 2023. This document conveys the appellate court's final ruling.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:24-cv-11178 Tyrell Ainsworth v. L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva, 2:24-cv-11178 Tyrell Ainsworth.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Tyrell Ainsworth v. L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva is an active appellate matter in Central District of California under docket 24-cv-11178.
The dispute currently identifies 2:24-cv-11178 Tyrell Ainsworth on one side and L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva on the other. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Issues preserved for appellate review, Appellate posture and standard of review.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mandate in the case of Tyrell Ainsworth v. County Sheriff Deputy Silva, indicating that the appeals court has completed its review and the lower court's decision stands. This mandate is a result of.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mandate in the case of Tyrell Ainsworth v. L.A. County Sheriff Deputy Silva, indicating that the appeals court has completed its review and the lower court's decision stands. This mandate is a result of the appeals process, where the plaintiff's claims were previously denied. The mandate is a formal notice to the parties and the lower court that the appeals process is complete.
USCA Mandate ( 16
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
4 hours, 10 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.