Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois entered a default judgment in favor of Spanish Prayers, LLC against The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A, docket number 25-cv-12545. The defendants failed to respond, resulting in the court ruling for the plaintiff by default.

Central District of California

The Central District of California is handling a counterclaim in Copenhagen v. DDC Enterprise Limited, docket number 25-cv-02708. The dispute involves business-related issues between the plaintiff and defendants, including DDC Enterprise Limited. The case remains active with ongoing filings.

Northern District of Illinois

Durovic requested an extension of the discovery deadline in the Northern District of Illinois civil case against BMO Bank, N.A., docket 25-cv-06559. The court granted additional time to complete discovery, affecting the litigation schedule.

Central District of California

In the Central District of California class action Paul E. Arlton et al v. Aerovironment, Inc., docket 20-cv-07438, the United States Court of Appeals issued a procedural order. The order reflects ongoing appellate litigation steps but does not disclose substantive rulings.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois entered a default judgment against defendants including Shenzhen Jiyou Supply Chain Co. LTD in docket 25-cv-06464. The defendants failed to respond within the required timeframe, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff.

Central District of California

In the Southern District of New York criminal case 2:23-cr-00116-2, the United States requested attorney appearance or reassignment for defendant Smith. This procedural step addresses representation issues in the criminal proceeding.

Central District of California

In docket 26-cv-02634 before the Central District of California, German Perez served the summons and complaint within the required 21-day period. This procedural compliance satisfies initial service requirements to advance the civil case.

Central District of California

In the criminal case USA v. Vaughn et al, docket 25-cr-00306 in the Central District of California, the court considered a motion for attorney withdrawal. The motion raises procedural and ethical issues about the attorney's continued representation of the defendant.

Central District of California

LS filed a motion for summary judgment against Hardin-Jefferson Independent School District in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-00394. The motion seeks to resolve the case without trial based on undisputed facts, though the nature of the dispute is not specified.

Central District of California

Gary Robinson Jr. filed an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) financial entry in his civil case against a non-federal defendant in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-00647. The IFP status waives court fees for litigants with limited financial resources, allowing the case to proceed despite financial constraints.

Central District of California

Ellis sued Wallet Buddha LLC in the Central District of California under docket 25-cv-01533. The dispute appears to involve business practices or contractual issues between the individual plaintiff and the defendant company, as reflected in a court memorandum or order.

Central District of California

Peters II v. Colonial Life involves plaintiffs suing an insurance company in the Central District of California under docket 26-cv-01602. The court issued a notice to counsel about consenting to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, a procedural option that allows the case to be handled by a magistrate judge instead

Southern District of Florida

Schaaf et al filed a reply supporting a motion against Nexo Capital in Southern District of Florida civil case 25-cv-62575. The reply provides additional arguments and evidence to support their motion.

Southern District of New York

United States attorneys appeared pro hac vice in Wang v. STMicroelectronics, Southern District of New York case 1:24-cv-06370. The case involves multiple defendants and is under active judicial consideration.

Southern District of New York

Troeger and JetBlue submitted a reply memorandum supporting a motion in Southern District of New York civil case 1:23-cv-10859. The filing adds legal arguments to bolster their position on a contested issue.

Central District of California

In Central District of California case 25-cv-03777, the plaintiff requested Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure No. 2 (ADR-1) against Los Angeles Unified School District. The request signals intent to resolve disputes outside traditional litigation.

Central District of California

The Southern District of New York entered judgment and commitment against Kamil and others totaling $205 in criminal case 2:23-cr-00532-3. The judgment marks a resolution phase in the criminal proceeding.

Northern District of California

Plaintiffs Kirola et al filed a civil suit against the City & County of San Francisco seeking acknowledgment of service in Northern District of California case 07-cv-03685. The case was originally filed in the Southern District of New York.

Central District of California

Almonte v. Almonte et al, Central District of California case 26-cv-02357, involves multiple parties in a dispute likely concerning contracts or property rights. Details remain limited, indicating early procedural posture or sealed information.

Northern District of California

In Schiavone v. Town of Orangetown, Northern District of California case 25-cv-03345, parties requested an extension of discovery deadlines. The extension indicates ongoing efforts to gather evidence relevant to claims against the municipal defendant.