Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

United States attorneys appeared pro hac vice in Wang v. STMicroelectronics, Southern District of New York case 1:24-cv-06370. The case involves multiple defendants and is under active judicial consideration.

Southern District of New York

Troeger and JetBlue submitted a reply memorandum supporting a motion in Southern District of New York civil case 1:23-cv-10859. The filing adds legal arguments to bolster their position on a contested issue.

Central District of California

In Central District of California case 25-cv-03777, the plaintiff requested Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure No. 2 (ADR-1) against Los Angeles Unified School District. The request signals intent to resolve disputes outside traditional litigation.

Central District of California

The Southern District of New York entered judgment and commitment against Kamil and others totaling $205 in criminal case 2:23-cr-00532-3. The judgment marks a resolution phase in the criminal proceeding.

Northern District of California

Plaintiffs Kirola et al filed a civil suit against the City & County of San Francisco seeking acknowledgment of service in Northern District of California case 07-cv-03685. The case was originally filed in the Southern District of New York.

Central District of California

Almonte v. Almonte et al, Central District of California case 26-cv-02357, involves multiple parties in a dispute likely concerning contracts or property rights. Details remain limited, indicating early procedural posture or sealed information.

Northern District of California

In Schiavone v. Town of Orangetown, Northern District of California case 25-cv-03345, parties requested an extension of discovery deadlines. The extension indicates ongoing efforts to gather evidence relevant to claims against the municipal defendant.

Central District of California

Emursive LLC filed a certificate of service in its lawsuit against From The Underground To Overground LLC and others in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-08561. This filing confirms proper delivery of documents to opposing parties, ensuring procedural compliance.

Central District of California

Plaintiffs in Tahatan-bey v. Equity Prime Mortgage oppose a motion filed by defendants in the Central District of California case 3:25-cv-07345. The dispute likely centers on mortgage or lending practices, with active litigation involving contested motions.

Central District of California

A magistrate in the Central District of California dismissed the complaint against Tremper-Aguilar. The dismissal indicates the court found insufficient grounds to proceed with the claims against this defendant.

Central District of California

Downey Hyundai Inc. filed an answer to the complaint in a civil case against Mustafa Amin in the Central District of California. This formal response marks the defendant's engagement with the plaintiff's allegations.

Northern District of California

In the Northern District of California, Alvarez filed a memorandum opposing a motion in a criminal case. The document presents legal arguments countering the government's position, shaping the court's consideration of the motion.

Northern District of California

The United States government filed a transcript order in the Northern District of California criminal case against Chang and others. The order pertains to the official record-keeping of trial proceedings.

Central District of California

A sealed filing in Stokes v. Gonzalez in the Central District of California raised confidentiality and procedural issues. The filing's sealed status suggests sensitive information is involved, impacting case transparency and discovery.

Central District of California

The Central District of California issued extensive procedural orders spanning 139 pages in Pinto v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance. The orders cover various rulings and case management issues in this multi-defendant civil lawsuit.

Central District of California

The Central District of California issued a report and recommendation in Altamirano v. Desert View Annex. The document likely contains judicial findings and suggested rulings to guide the court's next steps in the case.

District of Columbia

The District of Columbia court issued an order in Hills v. Staples, a civil litigation matter involving claims against Staples. The order reflects ongoing judicial oversight but does not specify substantive rulings or case developments.

Central District of California

The Central District of California ruled on a motion to amend pleadings in ACA International v. Fulford. The court's decision controls whether the parties can modify their claims or defenses, affecting the litigation's direction and case management.

Central District of California

The Central District of California granted UVA Health defendants an extension to file their answer in the Steven Patterson lawsuit. This procedural move delays the defendants' formal response to Patterson's allegations, extending the early litigation phase.

Central District of California

Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against Intuit Inc. in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-07280. The amendment shows efforts to refine or expand legal claims in the ongoing litigation.