Browse Cases

Central District of California

Susan F. and others sued Healthcare Service Corporation, doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-03622. The case likely involves insurance coverage or healthcare service disputes. Plaintiffs’ counsel received pro hac vice status to participate in the

Central District of California

Moar v. Nabi et al underwent case assignment or reassignment in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-02931. This procedural update involves judge assignment but does not reveal substantive case information.

Central District of California

The civil case Kunkel v. Aisera, Inc., docket 25-cv-09696 in the Central District of California, was terminated. The termination may reflect settlement, dismissal, or procedural closure, but no further details on the claims or reasons were provided.

Central District of California

Rahman initiated a civil suit against Catletti and others in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-03054. The case is currently in a procedural phase with deadlines and hearings being set, but no substantive details on the dispute are available.

Central District of California

Global Weather Productions, LLC and TV Today Network Limited addressed a procedural matter regarding consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-02367. The parties decided whether the case would proceed before a magistrate judge or district judge.

Central District of California

L.E.A.D., INC. filed a civil dispute against YOCCA in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-00626. The case is in early stages with limited information available about the claims or factual background.

Central District of California

The Central District of California set and reset deadlines and hearings in the civil case Capone et al v. Bloomquist, docket number 25-cv-11751. Plaintiff Daniela Capone and others pursue claims against defendant Jaclyn Rose Bloomquist. The scheduling adjustments indicate active case management.

Central District of California

Summons and complaint were served after 21 days in Perkins v. Scida, docket number 23-cv-02563, in the Central District of California. The service involved 338 documents. This step advances the civil case toward active litigation. The case involves plaintiff Preston D. Perkins against Joseph J. Scida and others.

Central District of California

Proof of service was executed after 49 days in Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. California Testing and Inspections Inc., docket number 24-cv-02588. This delay in service may affect procedural timelines. The case involves a civil dispute with pension trust plaintiffs.

Central District of California

The United States pursues civil forfeiture of $1,546,076.35 seized from Republic Bank of Arizona account 1889 in the Central District of California, docket number 18-cv-08420. The government seeks to retain these funds through legal proceedings. The case involves federal forfeiture laws and asset recovery.

Central District of California

Solo Industries Inc. filed a civil lawsuit against Impax Products Inc. in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-07665. The case is pending with no public details on claims or defenses. Further legal action is expected to clarify the dispute's nature and scope.

Central District of California

The Central District of California terminated a merged magistrate defendant in the criminal case United States v. Angulo-Padilla, docket number 26-mj-01624. This procedural action narrows the defendant list and may streamline the case. The case involves federal criminal charges against Angulo-Padilla.

Central District of California

In Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos et al, the Central District of California clerk ordered payment of tax costs, docket number 18-cv-01223. This order addresses post-judgment expenses related to the case. The underlying civil dispute details remain unspecified in the record.

Central District of California

Brown appeared in a civil lawsuit against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company in the Central District of California, docket number 24-cv-02691. The appearance marks a procedural step but does not provide details on the claims or defenses involved. The case remains active with further proceedings expected.

Central District of California

Plaintiff Jimenez Arroyo filed a civil lawsuit against Zwilling J.A. Henckels, LLC in the Central District of California, docket number 26-cv-03172. The case is in its initial phase with limited information on the nature of the claims or defenses. Further developments are needed to assess the dispute's scope.

Northern District of California

The Northern District of California set a Rule 26 scheduling conference in the civil case Merewitz v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., docket number 26-cv-03068. This conference will establish timelines for discovery and other pretrial activities. The case involves plaintiff Talia Merewitz suing American Honda and

Northern District of Illinois

In Payne v. John Howard Association et al, docket 25-cv-09234, the plaintiff advances claims against multiple defendants in the Northern District of Illinois. The case is in the pre-trial phase with claims being developed.

Central District of California

Patrick Byrne filed a memorandum outlining factual and legal claims against Ameris Bank in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-01989. The memorandum aims to establish key arguments supporting the plaintiff’s case.

Central District of California

Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is pursuing claims against Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-08609. The plaintiff seeks to prove service of documents, a procedural issue currently pending before the court.

Central District of California

Pacific Shore Stones, LLC submitted a joint Rule 26(f) report addressing discovery plans in a dispute with Allied Property in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-04370. The case has generated over 100 subsequent filings.