Browse Cases

Northern District of California

The Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust multidistrict litigation (MDL) No. 1917 in the Northern District of California saw a case management statement filed. This MDL consolidates related antitrust claims to coordinate discovery and pretrial matters under docket 07-cv-05944.

Northern District of California

Roberts et al submitted a stipulation and proposed order against Wellpath, LLC in the Northern District of California, docket 23-cv-03662. The filing likely addresses procedural or substantive issues to advance the case, though specific claims remain undisclosed.

Northern District of California

Berland v. X Corp., successor to Twitter, reached a conclusion at the appellate level in the Northern District of California. The issuance of a US Court of Appeals mandate signals the final appellate decision has been issued in docket 24-cv-07589.

Northern District of California

Hoang To settled a civil dispute with Directtou, LLC in the Northern District of California, docket 24-cv-06447. The settlement ends the litigation without disclosed terms, avoiding further court involvement.

Northern District of Illinois

Brain Corporation filed a civil lawsuit against Avidbots Corporation in the Northern District of Illinois under docket 24-cv-12569. The case lacks detailed information on the nature of the dispute or recent developments.

Northern District of Illinois

USA v. Fioravanti is a criminal case in the Northern District of Illinois with docket number 23-cr-00555. No recent substantive updates or procedural developments are reported.

Southern District of Florida

RMST Holding Company v. Premium 72 Capital is a civil case in the Southern District of Florida. The court addressed a motion to continue, indicating a request to delay proceedings but without details on the underlying dispute or reasons for the continuance.

Southern District of Florida

Villaruel et al v. Tradesmen Mechanical LLC is a civil case in the Southern District of Florida. The court docket 26-cv-22530 shows the summons affidavit has been returned, confirming service of process on the defendant.

Southern District of New York

Lindsey v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (23-cv-10166) features an extension of time granted in the Southern District of New York. This procedural development allows additional time for filings or responses, affecting the litigation schedule.

Southern District of New York

Level 12 Productions, LLC v. The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (26-cv-03893) involves a copyright matter in the Southern District of New York. The recent filing includes a notice of submission by attorney, reflecting procedural compliance in the case.

Southern District of New York

Guanzon v. Louis Vuitton North America, Inc. (25-cv-07240) underwent a redesignation to a magistrate judge in the Southern District of New York. This procedural change may affect case management, including discovery and pretrial motions.

Southern District of New York

Jaber v. Hanley (24-cv-00998) reached a conclusion in the Southern District of New York, with the issuance of a United States Court of Appeals mandate. This mandate signals the end of appellate proceedings and the return of the case to the district court or final resolution.

Southern District of New York

Senior v. Versuni USA Corporation (25-cv-10400) is a civil case in the Southern District of New York with no recent docket summaries available. The absence of updates may indicate early procedural stages or routine case management.

Southern District of New York

T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Village of Chestnut Ridge et al (23-cv-05852) saw a notice of case assignment or reassignment in the Southern District of New York. This procedural update signals a change in judicial oversight, potentially affecting case scheduling and management.

Southern District of New York

USA v. Liu (26-mj-01764) is a criminal matter pending in the Southern District of New York. The docket currently lacks detailed public updates, suggesting early-stage proceedings or sealed filings.

Southern District of New York

Thomas v. B. Arnold LLC et al (25-cv-04938) involves the submission of a proposed protective order in the Southern District of New York. The protective order aims to govern the handling of confidential information during discovery, reflecting the parties' efforts to manage sensitive data.

Southern District of New York

In Aguilera v. Yehl (26-cv-03885), the Southern District of New York issued a notice of case assignment or reassignment sua sponte. This procedural action indicates a change in the judge or magistrate overseeing the case, which may affect case management and scheduling.

Southern District of New York

Fredricks requested copies of transcripts and docket sheets in a case pending in the Southern District of New York. This procedural request indicates active litigation or preparation for further legal action. No substantive rulings or motions are noted at this stage.

Southern District of New York

GLD3 LLC and others filed a memorandum of law in support of a non-motion filing in their case against Albra and others in the Southern District of New York. The memorandum likely argues legal positions relevant to ongoing litigation or procedural matters. The case involves complex commercial or contractual disputes.

Southern District of New York

Wilson filed an amended complaint against John Doe defendants in the Southern District of New York. The amendment likely addresses deficiencies in the original complaint or adds new claims or parties. The case remains active and subject to further litigation steps.