Appellate mandate issued ending Jaber v. Hanley proceedings in SDNY
Case Summary
Jaber v. Hanley (24-cv-00998) reached a conclusion in the Southern District of New York, with the issuance of a United States Court of Appeals mandate. This mandate signals the end of appellate proceedings and the return of the case to the district court or final resolution.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Appellate mandate
- • Case resolution
- • Judicial finality
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-00998 Jaber v. Hanley
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:24-cv-00998 Jaber v. Hanley
The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Jaber v. Hanley, case number 1:24-cv-00998. This means the appellate court has finalized its decision and returned the case to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with that ruling. The mandate marks the end of the appeals process and triggers the next steps in the litigation.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
21 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.