civil-litigation federal-courts

Appellate mandate issued ending Jaber v. Hanley proceedings in SDNY

24-cv-00998 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jaber v. Hanley (24-cv-00998) reached a conclusion in the Southern District of New York, with the issuance of a United States Court of Appeals mandate. This mandate signals the end of appellate proceedings and the return of the case to the district court or final resolution.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Appellate mandate
  • Case resolution
  • Judicial finality
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Appellate

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:24-cv-00998 Jaber v. Hanley

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

1:24-cv-00998 Jaber v. Hanley

The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in the case Jaber v. Hanley, case number 1:24-cv-00998. This means the appellate court has finalized its decision and returned the case to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with that ruling. The mandate marks the end of the appeals process and triggers the next steps in the litigation.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

21 hours, 42 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.