Browse Cases

Western District of Washington

In the case titled Katrinssonr et al v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al, the plaintiffs have filed objections to a Report and Recommendation issued by the court. While specific details of the underlying claims are not provided, the objections indicate a procedural step in which the parties

Western District of Washington

The case 3:25-cv-05410 Barton v. Perkins involves a civil dispute between the parties Barton and Perkins. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the docket indicates ongoing proceedings in a federal court, with recent supplemental filings submitted to the court. The nature of the dispute and the relief

Western District of Washington

The case 3:26-cv-05333 Washington Wildlife First et al v. Susewind et al involves plaintiffs Washington Wildlife First and others bringing claims against defendants including Susewind. The docket references a Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement, which is a procedural filing typically required to inform the court

Central District of California

Couts Heating and Cooling Inc has filed a civil lawsuit against McCarthy Building Companies under docket number 25-cv-03174. The dispute arises between the two companies, which operate within the construction and building services industry. While specific claims and defenses have not been publicly disclosed, the

Central District of California

Anacapa Marine Street LLC has filed a civil lawsuit against Travelers Casualty Insurance, alleging that the insurer failed to fulfill its contractual obligations under an insurance policy. The dispute arises from Travelers Casualty Insurance's denial of coverage for certain damages claimed by Anacapa Marine Street

Central District of California

In the case 2:23-cv-02226 Tayler Ulmer v. StreetTeam Software, LLC, the plaintiff Tayler Ulmer has brought a lawsuit against StreetTeam Software, LLC. The case involves a dispute likely centered around contractual or business-related issues, as suggested by the parties involved. A recent development in the case

Central District of California

In the case of Adam Layne v. City of Hesperia et al, docket number 24-cv-01721, the parties are engaged in pretrial motions, including an in limine motion to exclude certain evidence. The motion aims to prevent specific information or testimony from being presented at trial, which could influence the jury's perception

Central District of California

In the case 2:22-cv-00047, plaintiffs Jeanene Popp, Luis Ponce, Jacob Roberts, and others filed a lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and associated defendants. The case involves procedural activities such as setting or resetting deadlines and hearings, as indicated by docket entry 27. Specific substantive

Central District of California

In the case of Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Mansion Live, LLC et al, the plaintiff, Scottsdale Insurance Company, initiated legal action against Mansion Live, LLC and other defendants. The docket entry indicates that an entry of default has been recorded, suggesting that one or more defendants failed to respond to

Southern District of New York

The case 1:21-cv-02522 Walgreen Co. v. Peters et al involves a legal dispute where Walgreen Co. is the plaintiff and Peters along with other defendants are the respondents. The docket number indicates it is a federal case filed in 2021. Specific details about the claims, parties' arguments, or court rulings are not

Northern District of Illinois

The court granted an extension of time in Morris v. Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Inc. et al, adjusting deadlines for filings or other procedural steps. This order affects the litigation schedule without changing substantive matters.

Northern District of Illinois

The court issued a memorandum opinion and order in Gevas v. Manzano et al, addressing key legal arguments or dispositive motions. This judicial decision clarifies contested issues and shapes the case’s trajectory.

Northern District of Illinois

In re Ethiopian Airlines Flight ET 302 Crash litigation involves complex, multi-party claims arising from the airline disaster. The court granted leave to file documents, reflecting ongoing procedural activity in this high-profile case.

Northern District of Illinois

Calvillo filed an amended complaint against the County and other defendants in the Northern District of Illinois. The amendment likely refines or expands legal claims and factual allegations in response to prior motions or developments.

Northern District of Illinois

In Henderson v. DeWolfe et al, the court set case management deadlines to structure the litigation timeline. These deadlines govern filings, discovery, and other pretrial activities to ensure orderly progress.

Northern District of Illinois

The court granted a discovery extension in Doty et al v. Village of South Holland, allowing more time to gather evidence. This procedural adjustment indicates complexities in fact-finding or coordination among parties.

Northern District of Illinois

Kas v. Roundy's Illinois LLC involves a motion for a protective order amid discovery disputes. The parties seek to limit disclosure of sensitive or proprietary information, reflecting contested pretrial negotiations over confidentiality and scope of discovery.

Northern District of Illinois

In Brown v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., the court granted a motion allowing an attorney to withdraw from representation. This change may affect case strategy and scheduling but does not alter the substantive claims or defenses.

Western District of Washington

The United States Court of Appeals issued a mandate in Murray v. Supreme Court of Washington, signaling the conclusion of appellate review. The case will proceed in the lower court consistent with the appellate ruling.

Western District of Washington

Kanam v. Lewis et al in the Western District of Washington has entered formal litigation with the issuance of a summons to the defendants. This procedural step marks the start of the case but does not reveal the nature of the claims or disputes involved.